From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/8]: PVH (PV guest with extensions)
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 09:37:36 -0400
Message-ID: <20120926133736.GA9919@phenom.dumpdata.com>
References: <20120921121202.3163c379@mantra.us.oracle.com>
	<1348665924.19176.41.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1348665924.19176.41.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
Cc: "Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>, Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 02:25:24PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-09-21 at 20:12 +0100, Mukesh Rathor wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> > 
> > Ok, I've made all the changes from prev RFC patch submission. Tested
> > all the combinations. The patches are a bit smaller from before, and
> > couldn't be separated like before, so I can't state whats different in
> > each patch. But, it's not too bad to review now.
> > 
> > As before, they were built on top of
> > fc6bdb59a501740b28ed3b616641a22c8dc5dd31 from the following tree:
> >         
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
> 
> Is that correct? That's this commit:
> 
> commit fc6bdb59a501740b28ed3b616641a22c8dc5dd31
> Merge: 44d82e2 1fcfd08
> Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
> Date:   Thu Aug 2 11:52:39 2012 -0700
> 
> Why so old? Makes it hard to take these for a spin due to the
> rebasing...

I rebased them on top v3.6-rc6 (look in #linux-next-pvh) but I must
have done something wrong b/c it won't boot as PVHVM. Time to do some git
bisection and see where I failed.

> 
> Ian.