From: Mukesh Rathor <mukesh.rathor@oracle.com>
To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
Cc: "Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@eu.citrix.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 7/8]: PVH privcmd changes
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 15:31:06 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121003153106.65237f07@mantra.us.oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1349270495.650.144.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>
On Wed, 3 Oct 2012 14:21:35 +0100
Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-09-21 at 20:21 +0100, Mukesh Rathor wrote:
> > +static int pvh_privcmd_resv_pfns(struct vm_area_struct *vma, int
> > numpgs)
> ...
> > + pvhp->pi_num_pgs = numpgs;
> > + BUG_ON(vma->vm_private_data != (void *)1);
> > + vma->vm_private_data = pvhp;
>
> How does this interact with:
>
> static int privcmd_enforce_singleshot_mapping(struct vm_area_struct
> *vma) {
> return (xchg(&vma->vm_private_data, (void *)1) == NULL);
> }
>
> If someone tries to map a second time then won't this correct the pvhp
> in vm_private_data by resetting it to 1? Then when the original
> mapping is torn down things all fall apart?
>
> Perhaps we need a cmpxchg here? Or to rework the callers a little bit
> perhaps.
Right, that's why I had it originally checking for auto xlated and
doing something different. I think that is better than to change this
and change again. I'll change it back to just putting the ptr here.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-03 22:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-21 19:21 [PATCH v1 7/8]: PVH privcmd changes Mukesh Rathor
2012-09-24 14:24 ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-09-25 13:44 ` Ian Campbell
2012-09-26 1:28 ` Mukesh Rathor
2012-09-26 13:13 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-09-25 13:46 ` Ian Campbell
2012-10-02 10:54 ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-10-03 13:21 ` Ian Campbell
2012-10-03 22:31 ` Mukesh Rathor [this message]
2012-10-04 8:50 ` Ian Campbell
2012-10-04 18:20 ` Mukesh Rathor
2012-10-05 9:21 ` Ian Campbell
2012-10-05 17:34 ` Mukesh Rathor
2012-10-05 21:22 ` Mukesh Rathor
2012-10-08 9:21 ` Ian Campbell
2012-10-08 19:10 ` Mukesh Rathor
2012-10-08 19:26 ` Ian Campbell
2012-10-08 20:46 ` Mukesh Rathor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121003153106.65237f07@mantra.us.oracle.com \
--to=mukesh.rathor@oracle.com \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=Stefano.Stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).