From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Mukesh Rathor <mukesh.rathor@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/8]: PVH (PV guest with extensions)
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2012 11:23:23 -0700
Message-ID: <20121004112323.611c7fdc@mantra.us.oracle.com>
References: <20120921121202.3163c379@mantra.us.oracle.com>
	<1348581263.11229.21.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>
	<20121001142826.1ebf7b0f@mantra.us.oracle.com>
	<1349170528.650.18.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>
	<20121003121122.0f20d5ed@mantra.us.oracle.com>
	<20121003203956.GA7526@phenom.dumpdata.com>
	<1349338526.650.204.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <1349338526.650.204.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
Cc: "Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>, Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@eu.citrix.com>, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Thu, 4 Oct 2012 09:15:26 +0100
Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 2012-10-03 at 21:39 +0100, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > > You Ok with XEN_ELFNOTE_GUEST_PVH, or should I call it
> > > XEN_ELFNOTE_PV_EXTENSIONS. Please LMK.
> 
> 
> > XEN_ELFNOTE_PVH_FEATURES ?
> > 
> > That way you can fill it with different 'features' flags
> > if need to. Say 1<<1 is basic, etc.
> 
> I don't think we need a PVH specific ELF note which just replicates
> the XENFEAT infrastructure at this stage, if we do come to that then
> it would be better to give PVH its own leaf in the existing feature
> space (e.g. starting at 1*32+0).
> 
> Ian.

Got it, thanks for the nice detailed note. I'll change it as above.

Mukesh