From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Subject: Re: 4.1.2 very slow without upstream patches, but fast with them, also 4.2 very slow Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2012 10:25:38 -0400 Message-ID: <20121004142538.GA9979@phenom.dumpdata.com> References: <501F98A1.4070806@brockmann-consult.de> <501FB9060200007800092D4E@nat28.tlf.novell.com> <5020C2DE.304@brockmann-consult.de> <50294D4B.9050405@brockmann-consult.de> <50296AC2.80600@brockmann-consult.de> <506C73A3.2030605@brockmann-consult.de> <506C9A84.5040408@brockmann-consult.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <506C9A84.5040408@brockmann-consult.de> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Peter Maloney Cc: xen-devel@lists.xen.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 10:05:24PM +0200, Peter Maloney wrote: > I also tested: > modprobe xen-acpi-processor You didn't say what kind of CPU you have. Nor if you compiled your kernel or if you used a distros' kernel. One thing (just to eliminate this being a power management issue), is to do this on the Linux command line: xen-acpi-processor.off=1 It would also help if you provided the .config you are using. There are some options you should not have one (like XEN_DEBUGFS.. something).