From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] xen PV passthru: assign SR-IOV virtual functions to separate virtual slots Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 10:51:34 -0400 Message-ID: <20121017145134.GA7594@phenom.dumpdata.com> References: <507E76BC02000078000A1DCD@nat28.tlf.novell.com> <1350467755-4825-1-git-send-email-lersek@redhat.com> <507E9E0D02000078000A1EDB@nat28.tlf.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <507E9E0D02000078000A1EDB@nat28.tlf.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jan Beulich Cc: andrew.cooper3@citrix.com, jeremy@goop.org, Laszlo Ersek , xen-devel@lists.xen.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 11:01:17AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 17.10.12 at 11:55, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > > VFs are reported as single-function devices in PCI_HEADER_TYPE, which > > causes pci_scan_slot() in the PV domU to skip all VFs beyond #0 in the > > pciback-provided slot. Avoid this by assigning each VF to a separate > > virtual slot. > > > > Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek > > Acked-by: Jan Beulich Applied.