From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Subject: Re: [RFC] ACPI S3 and Xen (suprisingly small\!). Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 13:43:17 -0400 Message-ID: <20121017174317.GA25443@phenom.dumpdata.com> References: <1350481786-4969-1-git-send-email-konrad.wilk@oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Ben Guthro Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, lenb@kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 01:46:09PM -0400, Ben Guthro wrote: > On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk > wrote: > [...] > > > The end result is this is a nice set of patches where there is only > > _one_ change in the x86 code (and it is just more of dealing with > > error case) - and the rest are all done in Xen side. > > I'm sorry to report that this series doesn't seem to work in my setup > against xen-unstable. > > To verify that it was, in fact this patch series, and not another Xen > regression - I swapped out the kernel with this patch series, with an > identical one, replacing only this series with your acpi-s3.v9 branch > - and everything worked fine. Thanks for testing it! I had tested it with Xen 4.1.3, which could be doing something different. Will see what is up.