From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Re: Xen 4 TSC problems
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 07:50:02 -0400
Message-ID: <20121023115001.GA23471@localhost.localdomain>
References: <CAE17a0W0Ehs62DzE-f6NsR9pRUFDGgMzDA-CxoCV3OEfTOHCmw@mail.gmail.com>
	<508509D902000078000A2DDA@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
	<CAE17a0WNSh3As_-QJYqtu_uQmHdMaZMRNVvk+Q3Q1nkUFNMgJQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<50852D8C02000078000A2E48@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
	<CAE17a0W9Jk_+oQKmeUD+-UOmBwjWZE=aEE4_=H_2An6A4c+rdg@mail.gmail.com>
	<5085530202000078000A2F12@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
	<CAE17a0VU3H8UmUWZv1+t98ME8LFgCZAWWBC1nhzM=ecbu6_GaQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<50866A2C02000078000A356D@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
	<CAE17a0U2c=urq=uW9+1nu=ogF8-ECQS++a67nWyS8=8sqgxu7Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<5086766502000078000A35D4@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <5086766502000078000A35D4@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Mauro <mrsanna1@gmail.com>, xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 09:50:13AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 23.10.12 at 10:40, Mauro <mrsanna1@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 23 October 2012 09:58, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote:
> >>>>> On 23.10.12 at 09:18, Mauro <mrsanna1@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>  A kernel run with no Xen underneath it.
> >>>
> >>> Here is:
> >>>
> >>> uname -a
> >>> Linux xen-p02 2.6.32-5-amd64 #1 SMP Sun Sep 23 10:07:46 UTC 2012
> >>> x86_64 GNU/Linux
> >>
> >> I'm sorry to say that, but 2.6.32 is nowhere close to "recent" (as
> >> I had asked for).
> > 
> > Sorry I'm using squeeze in production servers and I don't have a test
> > machine on which install wheezy.
> 
> And can't/don't want to install a self-built kernel?

You could also boot one of those Live Image kernels. Like an Fedora or
Ubuntu and just capture this. That way you don't over-write anything.