From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Olaf Hering Subject: Re: preparing for 4.2.1 and 4.1.4 Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 12:55:26 +0100 Message-ID: <20121105115526.GA18634@aepfle.de> References: <508E489502000078000A4FC6@nat28.tlf.novell.com> <20121030132951.GA4192@aepfle.de> <508FE6DD02000078000A56CF@nat28.tlf.novell.com> <20623.57765.463131.112836@mariner.uk.xensource.com> <5097AA3A02000078000A6528@nat28.tlf.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5097AA3A02000078000A6528@nat28.tlf.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jan Beulich Cc: xen-devel , Ian Jackson , Ian Campbell , Stefano Stabellini List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Mon, Nov 05, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 30.10.12 at 15:18, Ian Jackson wrote: > > I did a huge pile of backports late last week which seem to have > > broken some things. The bisector is working on it and I'm hoping it > > will report fairly shortly ... > > So what about the 4.1 tree? Should we cut RC1 there without any > tools backports? At least the locking change should be backported to 4.1 as a bugfix: changeset: 26079:b3b03536789a hotplug/Linux: close lockfd after lock attempt Olaf