From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: annie.li@oracle.com, marcos.matsunaga@oracle.com,
Ian.Campbell@citrix.com, xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Subject: domU to domU networking issues in v3.7? (netserver/netperf failing to communicate)
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2012 08:59:32 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121110135931.GD23686@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
Hey Ian, Xen-devel mailingl list,
I think the issue of 70% traffic lost was actually introduced in v3.6 or
perhaps v3.5. Annie and Marcos (CC-ed here) are looking to see which of
the releases introduced this. The issue we are seeing is that a domU
to domU communication breaks - this is with netperf/netserver talking to
each other.
Anyhow, I think the 3.7 compound page exacerbated the problem and also
(at least on some of my test hardware) exposed existing issues with
drivers. The issue I have is that the 'skge' driver has a bug that has
been there for ages (I tested way back to 3.0 and still saw it) were it
can not work with SWIOTLB. It is probably missing an pci_dma_sync
somewhere.
Anyhow the compound page got me to look at Xen-SWIOTLB and that looks
OK. Even with synthetic driver (the fake one I posted somewhere) it
dealt with compound pages properly (with debug or non-debug Xen
hypervisor).
So was wondering if you had looked at this in more details? Any
ideas? Or would it be more prudent to ask that once we know for sure
which Linux release introduced the communication failures between
guests?
next reply other threads:[~2012-11-10 13:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-10 13:59 Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2012-11-12 9:54 ` domU to domU networking issues in v3.7? (netserver/netperf failing to communicate) Ian Campbell
2012-11-12 14:28 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-11-12 14:41 ` Ian Campbell
2012-11-12 14:50 ` Sander Eikelenboom
2012-11-12 16:32 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-11-12 17:20 ` Sander Eikelenboom
2012-11-14 6:24 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-11-16 9:46 ` Sander Eikelenboom
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121110135931.GD23686@localhost.localdomain \
--to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=annie.li@oracle.com \
--cc=marcos.matsunaga@oracle.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).