From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tim Deegan Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen/arm: build as zImage Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2012 16:39:48 +0000 Message-ID: <20121123163948.GC97222@ocelot.phlegethon.org> References: <1353686042.16973.19.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> <1353687991.16973.26.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1353687991.16973.26.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Campbell Cc: Anthony Perard , "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , Stefano Stabellini List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org At 16:26 +0000 on 23 Nov (1353687991), Ian Campbell wrote: > http://www.simtec.co.uk/products/SWLINUX/files/booting_article.html > says: > The start address is usually 0 as the zImage code is position > independent. > > Of course this has to be true in the modern multiplatform zImage world. > > Looking at a random zImage: > 000000 e1a00000 e1a00000 e1a00000 e1a00000 > * > 000020 ea000002 016f2818 00000000 00220548 > > Where 016f2818 is the magic, 0 is the start and 220548 is the > end/length. > > I knew I didn't imagine it ;-) Yay! We should definitely do that then, at least until we get a report of it not working. :) Tim.