From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Subject: Re: LVM Checksum error when using persistent grants (#linux-next + stable/for-jens-3.8) Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2012 09:22:23 -0500 Message-ID: <20121207142222.GA3303@phenom.dumpdata.com> References: <1351097925-26221-1-git-send-email-roger.pau@citrix.com> <20121206031455.GA4408@phenom.dumpdata.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20121206031455.GA4408@phenom.dumpdata.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Roger Pau Monne List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 10:14:55PM -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > Hey Roger, > > I am seeing this weird behavior when using #linux-next + stable/for-jens-3.8 tree. To make it easier I just used v3.7-rc8 and merged stable/for-jens-3.8 tree. > > Basically I can do 'pvscan' on xvd* disk and quite often I get checksum errors: > > # pvscan /dev/xvdf > PV /dev/xvdf2 VG VolGroup00 lvm2 [18.88 GiB / 0 free] > PV /dev/dm-14 VG vg_x86_64-pvhvm lvm2 [4.00 GiB / 68.00 MiB free] > PV /dev/dm-12 VG vg_i386-pvhvm lvm2 [4.00 GiB / 68.00 MiB free] > PV /dev/dm-11 VG vg_i386 lvm2 [4.00 GiB / 68.00 MiB free] > PV /dev/sda VG guests lvm2 [931.51 GiB / 220.51 GiB free] > Total: 5 [962.38 GiB] / in use: 5 [962.38 GiB] / in no VG: 0 [0 ] > # pvscan /dev/xvdf > /dev/xvdf2: Checksum error > Couldn't read volume group metadata. > /dev/xvdf2: Checksum error > Couldn't read volume group metadata. > PV /dev/dm-14 VG vg_x86_64-pvhvm lvm2 [4.00 GiB / 68.00 MiB free] > PV /dev/dm-12 VG vg_i386-pvhvm lvm2 [4.00 GiB / 68.00 MiB free] > PV /dev/dm-11 VG vg_i386 lvm2 [4.00 GiB / 68.00 MiB free] > PV /dev/sda VG guests lvm2 [931.51 GiB / 220.51 GiB free] > Total: 4 [943.50 GiB] / in use: 4 [943.50 GiB] / in no VG: 0 [0 ] > > This is with a i386 dom0, 64-bit Xen 4.1.3 hypervisor, and with either > 64-bit or 32-bit PV or PVHVM guest. And it does not matter if dom0 is 64-bit. > > Have you seen something like this? More interestingly is that the failure is the frontend. I ran the "new" guests that do persistent grants with the old backends (so v3.7-rc8 virgin) and still got the same failure. > > Note, the other LV disks are over iSCSI and are working fine. > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@lists.xen.org > http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel >