From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/04] HVM firmware passthrough Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2013 09:55:55 -0500 Message-ID: <20130109145555.GA19595@phenom.dumpdata.com> References: <831D55AF5A11D64C9B4B43F59EEBF720A31F6B645F@FTLPMAILBOX02.citrite.net> <831D55AF5A11D64C9B4B43F59EEBF720A31FBE1BE8@FTLPMAILBOX02.citrite.net> <516D2318-7330-49AD-9BC0-222274803CC7@gmail.com> <831D55AF5A11D64C9B4B43F59EEBF720A31FBE1BF3@FTLPMAILBOX02.citrite.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <831D55AF5A11D64C9B4B43F59EEBF720A31FBE1BF3@FTLPMAILBOX02.citrite.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ross Philipson Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Will , "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 07:14:11PM -0500, Ross Philipson wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Konrad Rzeszutek Will [mailto:ketuzsezr@gmail.com] > > Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2013 7:00 PM > > To: Ross Philipson > > Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com > > Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 00/04] HVM firmware passthrough > > > > On Jan 8, 2013, at 3:26 PM, Ross Philipson > > wrote: > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > > >> From: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org [mailto:xen-devel- > > >> bounces@lists.xen.org] On Behalf Of Ross Philipson > > >> Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 1:55 PM > > >> To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com > > >> Subject: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 00/04] HVM firmware passthrough > > >> > > >> This patch series introduces support of loading external blocks of > > >> firmware > > >> into a guest. These blocks can currently contain SMBIOS and/or ACPI > > >> firmware > > >> information that is used by HVMLOADER to modify a guests virtual > > >> firmware at > > >> startup. These modules are only used by HVMLOADER and are effectively > > >> discarded after HVMLOADER has completed. > > > ... > > > > > > Is there anything else I need to do to get this patch series accepted? > > > > Address the comments we had. I believe it was on making this be part of > > "xl" guest config parsing. > > Oh I thought I did. I said I would submit a separate set of patches for > the work in xl once the earlier bits were in. Is that not an acceptable > approach? Somehow I missed that. I thought there were also comments on how the call to the library should be done? As in - not introduce a new one but alter the existing one? Or am I thinking of a different patchset?