From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mukesh Rathor Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/16]: PVH xen: add XENMEM_add_to_physmap_range Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 16:34:27 -0800 Message-ID: <20130114163427.4c2c797f@mantra.us.oracle.com> References: <20130111172856.47458602@mantra.us.oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Keir Fraser Cc: "Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Sat, 12 Jan 2013 07:51:29 +0000 Keir Fraser wrote: > On 12/01/2013 01:28, "Mukesh Rathor" wrote: > > > In this patch we add a new function xenmem_add_to_physmap_range(), > > and change xenmem_add_to_physmap_once parameters so it can be > > called from xenmem_add_to_physmap_range. There is no PVH specific > > change here. > > > > BTW, there are 16 patches and not 15. Sorry, corrected the subject. > > > > Signed-off-by: Mukesh Rathor > > > > > > diff -r 278d7a933d88 -r ede1afe68962 xen/arch/x86/mm.c > > --- a/xen/arch/x86/mm.c Fri Jan 11 16:19:40 2013 -0800 > > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm.c Fri Jan 11 16:20:38 2013 -0800 > > @@ -4218,8 +4218,8 @@ static int handle_iomem_range(unsigned l > > } > > > > static int xenmem_add_to_physmap_once( > > - struct domain *d, > > - const struct xen_add_to_physmap *xatp) > > + struct domain *d, uint16_t xatp_space, domid_t foreign_domid, > > + unsigned long xatp_idx, unsigned long xatp_gpfn) > > The new caller should pack these arguments into a xen_add_to_physmap > struct like all the others do. Don't atomise struct arguments like > this, it's gross. > > -- Keir > Ok, done.