xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mukesh Rathor <mukesh.rathor@oracle.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/16]: PVH xen: Add PHYSDEVOP_map_iomem
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 18:23:49 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130125182349.1e666ec1@mantra.us.oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51024AE402000078000B9792@nat28.tlf.novell.com>

On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 08:05:40 +0000
"Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote:

> >>> On 25.01.13 at 02:53, Mukesh Rathor <mukesh.rathor@oracle.com>
> >>> wrote:
> > Since this happens once during boot, I am ok either way. Staying
> > with what I've keeps linux code clean and also provides flexibily
> > for future in case. But if you feel strongly, I can special case
> > dom0 in linux to assume xen has it all mapped, and generate a patch
> > there. Please lmk.
> 
> Hmm, special casing Dom0 isn't what I'm after. I want this to be
> transparent to the kernel in all cases (keeps the Linux code even
> cleaner).

Ok. I am looking into it. Stefano, Ian, any comments? You guys OK with
that approach? I probably won't need PHYSDEVOP_map_iomem then.

thanks,
Mukesh

  reply	other threads:[~2013-01-26  2:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-12  1:32 [RFC PATCH 3/16]: PVH xen: Add PHYSDEVOP_map_iomem Mukesh Rathor
2013-01-14 11:23 ` Jan Beulich
2013-01-15 23:35   ` Mukesh Rathor
2013-01-16  9:45     ` Jan Beulich
2013-01-24  2:12       ` Mukesh Rathor
2013-01-24  9:23         ` Jan Beulich
2013-01-25  1:53           ` Mukesh Rathor
2013-01-25  8:05             ` Jan Beulich
2013-01-26  2:23               ` Mukesh Rathor [this message]
2013-01-26  3:04                 ` Mukesh Rathor
2013-01-28 15:13                   ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-01-28 16:43                     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-01-28 16:47                       ` Jan Beulich
2013-01-28 16:50                         ` Ian Campbell
2013-01-28 10:55                 ` Ian Campbell
2013-01-24 15:06 ` Tim Deegan
2013-01-25  1:03   ` Mukesh Rathor
2013-01-28 16:39     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-01-28 16:47       ` Jan Beulich
2013-01-30 21:24         ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130125182349.1e666ec1@mantra.us.oracle.com \
    --to=mukesh.rathor@oracle.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).