From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Samuel Thibault Subject: Re: PVH questions Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 15:58:26 +0100 Message-ID: <20130130145826.GB6193@type.bordeaux.inria.fr> References: <20130128015930.GW6051@type.youpi.perso.aquilenet.fr> <20130128020020.GX6051@type.youpi.perso.aquilenet.fr> <20130130140035.GZ6193@type.bordeaux.inria.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Stefano Stabellini Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Stefano Stabellini, le Wed 30 Jan 2013 14:28:39 +0000, a =E9crit : > On Wed, 30 Jan 2013, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > A couple more questions: > > = > > - Does hvm_callback_vector flags designates routing events through > > interrupt vector 0xf3? > = > XENFEAT_hvm_callback_vector determins the hypervisor capability, while > you need an HVMOP_set_param hypercall to set HVM_PARAM_CALLBACK_IRQ to = > enable it. Ok, but I mean: does XENFEAT_hvm_callback_vector mean that HVM_PARAM_CALLBACK_IRQ can be set? > Actually the vector number can be chosen. Ok. > > - Is PIC/APIC I/O emulated by the hypervisor, as well as PIT? = > = > Yes (hvm_domain_initialise is called for PVH guests). = Ok, good! > > And does hvm_callback_vector designates that fact? > = > PVH implies it I know, but there's not "PVH" flag in the hypervisor capabilities, that's why I'm asking which flag advertises the capability. Samuel