From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tim Deegan Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 10/16]: PVH xen: introduce vmx_pvh.c Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 20:33:43 +0000 Message-ID: <20130221203343.GA32191@ocelot.phlegethon.org> References: <20130111180110.55ce77aa@mantra.us.oracle.com> <20130124163122.GJ20551@ocelot.phlegethon.org> <20130219160534.062dba2f@mantra.us.oracle.com> <20130220095828.GA12083@ocelot.phlegethon.org> <20130220190519.5fb537b1@mantra.us.oracle.com> <20130221091001.GD24051@ocelot.phlegethon.org> <20130221112004.05fdb740@mantra.us.oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130221112004.05fdb740@mantra.us.oracle.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Mukesh Rathor Cc: "Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org At 11:20 -0800 on 21 Feb (1361445604), Mukesh Rathor wrote: > > It still needs to be handled. :) You are testing this stuff on AMD > > as well, right? > > Right, in pvh_svm.c when its ported. I had talked to someone from AMD > at xen summit who said he'd port it to AMD as soon as phase I patch > is checked in. It shouldn't be too hard to do that. I estimate a week > or two if I was to do SVM changes. OK, so long as there's a plan. :) Cheers, Tim.