xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>
Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	Malcolm Crossley <malcolm.crossley@citrix.com>,
	boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>,
	"xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] vmx/nmi: Do not use self_nmi() in VMEXIT handler
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 09:51:20 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130228145120.GD580@phenom.dumpdata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130228130008.GE27704@ocelot.phlegethon.org>

On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 01:00:08PM +0000, Tim Deegan wrote:
> At 09:58 +0000 on 28 Feb (1362045494), Jan Beulich wrote:
> > >>> On 22.11.12 at 17:12, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > >>>> On 22.11.12 at 17:05, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote:
> > > > On 22/11/12 15:55, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > >>>>> On 22.11.12 at 16:37, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote:
> > > >>> A quick solution would be to execute a noop function with
> > > >>> run_in_exception_handler().  Alternatively, I can code enable_nmi() or
> > > >>> so which does an inline iret to itself.  Which of these would you prefer?
> > > >> I would actually consider avoiding to run softirqs altogether in that
> > > >> case, just like native Linux doesn't do any event or scheduler
> > > >> processing in that case.
> > > > 
> > > > That would probably be the easiest solution.
> > > > 
> > > > I was already going to do the same for the rentrant NMI and MCE handling
> > > > case (and also the process pending upcalls checking), due to the
> > > > complexities of fixing the race condition at the end of the handler.
> > > > 
> > > > Unfortunately, I don't think I have time to look at this issue
> > > > immediately, but if it is ok to wait till the beginning of next week, I
> > > 
> > > That's fine of course.
> > 
> > So that was 3 months ago, and we're likely going to need to do
> > further unfixed releases if this won't move forward. Can you
> > estimate whether you'll be able to get back to this?
> 
> Let's make a step in the right direction before 4.3, at least:

FYI, this also fixes oprofile being able to collect HVM guest
data.

> 
> commit d278beed1df2d226911dce92295411018c9bba2f
> Author: Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>
> Date:   Thu Feb 28 12:42:15 2013 +0000
> 
>     vmx: handle NMIs before re-enabling interrupts.
>     
>     Also, switch to calling do_nmi() and explicitly re-enabling NMIs
>     rather than raising a fake NMI and relying on the NMI processing to
>     IRET, since that handling code is likely to change a fair amount in
>     future.
>     
>     Signed-off-by: Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>
> 
> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c
> index 5378928..462bb0f 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c
> @@ -2313,6 +2313,13 @@ void vmx_vmexit_handler(struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
>          vector = intr_info & INTR_INFO_VECTOR_MASK;
>          if ( vector == TRAP_machine_check )
>              do_machine_check(regs);
> +        if ( vector == TRAP_machine_check
> +             && ((intr_info & INTR_INFO_INTR_TYPE_MASK) ==
> +                 (X86_EVENTTYPE_NMI << 8)) )
> +        {
> +            do_nmi(regs);
> +            enable_nmis();
> +        }
>          break;
>      case EXIT_REASON_MCE_DURING_VMENTRY:
>          do_machine_check(regs);
> @@ -2486,7 +2493,7 @@ void vmx_vmexit_handler(struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
>                   (X86_EVENTTYPE_NMI << 8) )
>                  goto exit_and_crash;
>              HVMTRACE_0D(NMI);
> -            self_nmi(); /* Real NMI, vector 2: normal processing. */
> +            /* Already handled above. */
>              break;
>          case TRAP_machine_check:
>              HVMTRACE_0D(MCE);
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-02-28 14:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-22 15:00 [PATCH V3] vmx/nmi: Do not use self_nmi() in VMEXIT handler Andrew Cooper
2012-11-22 15:15 ` Jan Beulich
2012-11-22 15:16   ` Andrew Cooper
2012-11-22 15:21     ` Jan Beulich
2012-11-22 15:37       ` Andrew Cooper
2012-11-22 15:55         ` Jan Beulich
2012-11-22 16:05           ` Andrew Cooper
2012-11-22 16:12             ` Jan Beulich
2012-11-22 16:31               ` Andrew Cooper
2013-02-28  9:58             ` Jan Beulich
2013-02-28 12:32               ` Andrew Cooper
2013-02-28 13:00               ` Tim Deegan
2013-02-28 13:12                 ` Andrew Cooper
2013-02-28 13:39                 ` Jan Beulich
2013-02-28 14:25                   ` Tim Deegan
2013-02-28 14:42                     ` Jan Beulich
2013-02-28 14:45                       ` Andrew Cooper
2013-02-28 14:49                       ` Tim Deegan
2013-02-28 15:01                         ` Jan Beulich
2013-02-28 15:41                       ` Jan Beulich
2013-02-28 15:52                         ` Andrew Cooper
2013-02-28 15:55                         ` Tim Deegan
2013-02-28 16:12                           ` Jan Beulich
2013-02-28 16:01                         ` Keir Fraser
2013-02-28 16:17                           ` Jan Beulich
2013-02-28 19:02                             ` Keir Fraser
2013-03-01 10:49                               ` [PATCH v2 0/2] x86: defer processing events on the NMI exit path Jan Beulich
2013-03-01 10:56                                 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] " Jan Beulich
2013-03-01 11:37                                   ` Andrew Cooper
2013-03-01 11:53                                     ` Jan Beulich
2013-03-01 15:56                                       ` Keir Fraser
2013-03-01 16:01                                         ` Andrew Cooper
2013-03-01 16:08                                           ` Jan Beulich
2013-03-01 10:57                                 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] x86: don't rely on __softirq_pending to be the first field in irq_cpustat_t Jan Beulich
2013-03-01 15:55                                 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] x86: defer processing events on the NMI exit path Keir Fraser
2013-02-28 13:42                 ` [PATCH V3] vmx/nmi: Do not use self_nmi() in VMEXIT handler Jan Beulich
2013-02-28 14:04                   ` Tim Deegan
2013-02-28 14:51                 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2012-11-22 15:22     ` Mats Petersson
2012-11-22 16:00       ` Jan Beulich
2012-11-22 17:34 ` Tim Deegan
2012-11-26 11:50   ` George Dunlap

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130228145120.GD580@phenom.dumpdata.com \
    --to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=malcolm.crossley@citrix.com \
    --cc=tim@xen.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).