xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>,
	Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>,
	xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs/traces Acked patches.
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 15:57:31 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130325195731.GA652@phenom.dumpdata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFLBxZZgu+zpC_gqhaCiH+qrFoa26S=r_-9Prf1V57KG_V_Mug@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 04:43:24PM +0000, George Dunlap wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote:
> >>>> On 25.03.13 at 16:37, George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com> wrote:
> >> On 25/03/13 15:13, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>>>>> On 25.03.13 at 15:41, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> wrote:
> >>>> Please commit these patches. I can also put these on a git tree
> >>>> (if you could create on for me on xenbits.org that is it) for a git pull.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> The trace patches have been Acked-by George.
> >>> You know what - I didn't apply them precisely because the ack
> >>> came through only for patches 3 and 4. I just checked the
> >>> xen-devel archives again, and that's the state of affairs right
> >>> now too. Possibly the ack was sent to you without Cc-ing
> >>> xen-devel, but that doesn't allow me to apply them.
> >>
> >> Is that because I had already Ack-ed an earlier version of the same
> >> patches, as noted right above Konrad's S-o-B line?
> >
> > I must have overlooked that, partly because I expect Acked-by
> > to be below Signed-off-by (only Reported-by goes ahead of it in
> > my opinion, to reflect work/event flow).
> >
> >> I'm not 100% sure the normal protocol, but Konrad has been around the
> >> block a few times; I would think that if Konrad put my Ack-by on
> >> something, then that should have the presumption of validity --
> >> particularly if he cc'd me (which he did) and I didn't nack it.
> >
> > I see now that he Cc-ed you on the post from the 18th, but I
> > specifically noted that he didn't Cc you on the resubmission
> > today. Which together with me not having noticed the earlier
> > ack made things look inconsistent/incomplete.
> 
> Ah, right -- which is also why I didn't notice that he had re-sent the
> patch series. :-)
> 
> Konrad, are you not using "git send-email"? I thought it normally

I am.

> added cc's for Acked-by's...

It usually does. Wonder if I accidently hit the 'n' key when it asks me whether
to add those emails to it.

> 
>  -George

  reply	other threads:[~2013-03-25 19:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-03-25 14:41 [PATCH] docs/traces Acked patches Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-03-25 14:41 ` [PATCH 01/11] trace: Use correct trace class for power management changes Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-03-25 14:41 ` [PATCH 02/11] trace: Add trace events for IRQ activities Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-03-25 14:41 ` [PATCH 03/11] trace: Add the other variant of do_block Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-03-25 14:41 ` [PATCH 04/11] trace: Add reason for NMI exit TRAP Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-03-25 14:41 ` [PATCH 05/11] docs: Document the ELF notes Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-03-25 14:41 ` [PATCH 06/11] docs: Document the ELF_FEATURES entry Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-03-25 14:41 ` [PATCH 07/11] docs: Add some extra details to the ELF note Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-03-25 14:41 ` [PATCH 08/11] docs: Document the shared structure Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-03-25 14:41 ` [PATCH 09/11] docs: Document the dom0_vga_console_info structure Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-03-25 14:41 ` [PATCH 10/11] docs: Document start_info changes in Xen 4.2 Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-03-25 14:41 ` [PATCH 11/11] docs: Document the XenBus structure Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-03-25 15:13 ` [PATCH] docs/traces Acked patches Jan Beulich
2013-03-25 15:37   ` George Dunlap
2013-03-25 15:48     ` Jan Beulich
2013-03-25 16:43       ` George Dunlap
2013-03-25 19:57         ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2013-03-25 16:46       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-03-25 17:20         ` Jan Beulich
2013-03-25 20:04           ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-04-10  9:24         ` Ian Campbell
2013-03-26 16:28 ` Ian Jackson
2013-03-27 16:36   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-03-28 16:00     ` Ian Jackson
2013-03-29 13:06       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130325195731.GA652@phenom.dumpdata.com \
    --to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).