From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Mukesh Rathor <mukesh.rathor@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/18 V2]: PVH xen: PVH dom0 creation...
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 17:34:57 -0700
Message-ID: <20130326173457.43722909@mantra.us.oracle.com>
References: <20130315180645.59f8618e@mantra.us.oracle.com>
	<51471E3302000078000C65FD@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <51471E3302000078000C65FD@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 13:01:23 +0000
"Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote:

>  >>> On 16.03.13 at 02:06, Mukesh Rathor <mukesh.rathor@oracle.com>
>  >>> wrote:
> > +static __init void copy_pvh(char *dest, char *src, int bytes)
> > +{
> > +    /* raw_copy_to_guest() -> copy_to_user_hvm -> __hvm_copy needs
> > curr 
> > +     * to point to the hvm/pvh vcpu. Hence for PVH dom0 we can't
> > use that.
> > +     * So we just use dbg_rw_mem().
> > +     */
> > +    int rem = dbg_rw_mem((dbgva_t)dest, (unsigned char *)src,
> > bytes, 0, 1, 0);
> 
> Same comment as before: This is not acceptable for a submission
> of a patch intended to be committed (i.e. non-RFC). You should
> have worked out a suitable solution to this before posting.

Well, the prev patch was RFC and I dind't hear anything on this, so 
(mis) understood this was acceptable. Ok, I will just implmement
copy_pvh() here.