Re: [PATCH 06/17] PVH xen: Introduce PVH guest type

[Mukesh Rathor <mukesh.rathor@oracle.com>]

On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 08:07:08 +0100
"Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote:

> >>> On 23.04.13 at 23:25, Mukesh Rathor <mukesh.rathor@oracle.com>
> >>> wrote:
> > This patch introduces the concept of a pvh guest. There are also
> > other basic changes like creating macros to check for pvh
> > vcpu/domain, and creating new macros to see if it's pv/pvh/hvm
> > domain/vcpu. Also, modify copy macros to include pvh. Lastly, we
> > introduce that PVH uses HVM style event delivery.
> > 
> > Chagnes in V2:
> >   - make is_pvh/is_hvm enum instead of adding is_pvh as a new flag.
> >   - fix indentation and spacing in guest_kernel_mode macro.
> >   - add debug only BUG() in GUEST_KERNEL_RPL macro as it should no
> > longer be called in any PVH paths.
> > 
> > Chagnes in V3:
> >   - Rename enum fields, and add is_pv to it.
> >   - Get rid if is_hvm_or_pvh_* macros.
> > 
> > Chagnes in V4:
> >   - Move e820 fields out of pv_domain struct.
> 
> Is there any reason why this can't be a standalone patch?
> 
> Jan
> 

I could move it, the e820 field changes, to an earlier smaller prep
patch or create a separate one if they are all big.


M-