From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Mukesh Rathor <mukesh.rathor@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/17]  PVH xen: Miscellaneous changes
Date: Thu, 9 May 2013 18:54:58 -0700
Message-ID: <20130509185458.520b80f9@mantra.us.oracle.com>
References: <1366752366-16594-1-git-send-email-mukesh.rathor@oracle.com>
	<1366752366-16594-16-git-send-email-mukesh.rathor@oracle.com>
	<5177BCAE02000078000D0404@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <5177BCAE02000078000D0404@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 10:06:22 +0100
"Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote:

> >>> On 23.04.13 at 23:26, Mukesh Rathor <mukesh.rathor@oracle.com>
> >>> wrote:
> > --- a/xen/include/public/xen.h
> > +++ b/xen/include/public/xen.h
> > @@ -693,6 +693,8 @@ typedef struct shared_info shared_info_t;
> >   *      c. list of allocated page frames [mfn_list, nr_pages]
> >   *         (unless relocated due to XEN_ELFNOTE_INIT_P2M)
> >   *      d. start_info_t structure        [register ESI (x86)]
> > + *      d1. struct shared_info_t                [shared_info]
> > + *                   (above if auto translated guest only)
> >   *      e. bootstrap page tables         [pt_base and CR3 (x86)]
> >   *      f. bootstrap stack               [register ESP (x86)]
> >   *  4. Bootstrap elements are packed together, but each is
> > 4kB-aligned.
> 
> This adjustment should be done in the patch implementing this.

Happens in tool stack for domU and construct_dom0 for dom0. So probably
best to leave in this patch? Or I could move it to last patch changing  
construct_dom0.

thanks
M