From: Mukesh Rathor <mukesh.rathor@oracle.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/20] PVH xen: add XENMEM_add_to_physmap_range
Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 16:05:00 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130515160500.337cd014@mantra.us.oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5193787302000078000D659C@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
On Wed, 15 May 2013 10:58:43 +0100
"Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote:
> >>> On 15.05.13 at 02:52, Mukesh Rathor <mukesh.rathor@oracle.com>
> >>> wrote:
> > --- a/xen/arch/x86/mm.c
> > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm.c
> > @@ -4519,7 +4519,8 @@ static int handle_iomem_range(unsigned long
> > s, unsigned long e, void *p)
> > static int xenmem_add_to_physmap_once(
> > struct domain *d,
> > - const struct xen_add_to_physmap *xatp)
> > + const struct xen_add_to_physmap *xatp,
> > + domid_t foreign_domid)
> > {
> > struct page_info *page = NULL;
> > unsigned long gfn = 0; /* gcc ... */
> > @@ -4646,7 +4647,7 @@ static int xenmem_add_to_physmap(struct
> > domain *d,
>
> I know I said this before: This patch can't be complete, or else the
> new function parameter would actually get used. With the way
> things are, if this patch gets applied, a user of the new XENMEM_
> sub-op would not get the expected behavior.
>
No, the new foreign_domid parameter is meaningful for only the
XENMAPSPACE_gmfn_foreign OP which is defined in patch 0018. So we
should be OK here.
thanks
Mukesh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-15 23:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-15 0:52 [PATCH 00/20][V5]: PVH xen: version 5 patches Mukesh Rathor
2013-05-15 0:52 ` [PATCH 01/20] PVH xen: turn gdb_frames/gdt_ents into union Mukesh Rathor
2013-05-15 0:52 ` [PATCH 02/20] PVH xen: add XENMEM_add_to_physmap_range Mukesh Rathor
2013-05-15 9:58 ` Jan Beulich
2013-05-15 23:05 ` Mukesh Rathor [this message]
2013-05-16 7:21 ` Jan Beulich
2013-05-16 11:03 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-05-16 12:01 ` Jan Beulich
2013-05-16 15:04 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-05-16 23:56 ` Mukesh Rathor
2013-05-17 6:37 ` Jan Beulich
2013-05-17 22:24 ` Mukesh Rathor
2013-05-15 0:52 ` [PATCH 03/20] PVH xen: create domctl_memory_mapping() function Mukesh Rathor
2013-05-15 10:07 ` Jan Beulich
2013-05-15 0:52 ` [PATCH 04/20] PVH xen: add params to read_segment_register Mukesh Rathor
2013-05-15 0:52 ` [PATCH 05/20] PVH xen: vmx realted preparatory changes for PVH Mukesh Rathor
2013-05-15 0:52 ` [PATCH 06/20] PVH xen: Move e820 fields out of pv_domain struct Mukesh Rathor
2013-05-15 10:27 ` Jan Beulich
2013-05-15 0:52 ` [PATCH 07/20] PVH xen: Introduce PVH guest type Mukesh Rathor
2013-05-15 0:52 ` [PATCH 08/20] PVH xen: tools changes to create PVH domain Mukesh Rathor
2013-05-15 0:52 ` [PATCH 09/20] PVH xen: domain creation code changes Mukesh Rathor
2013-05-15 0:52 ` [PATCH 10/20] PVH xen: create PVH vmcs, and also initialization Mukesh Rathor
2013-05-15 0:52 ` [PATCH 11/20] PVH xen: introduce pvh.c Mukesh Rathor
2013-05-15 10:42 ` Jan Beulich
2013-05-16 1:42 ` Mukesh Rathor
2013-05-16 8:00 ` Jan Beulich
2013-05-17 0:27 ` Mukesh Rathor
2013-05-17 6:43 ` Jan Beulich
2013-05-21 0:08 ` Mukesh Rathor
2013-05-21 7:07 ` Jan Beulich
2013-05-15 0:52 ` [PATCH 12/20] PVH xen: create read_descriptor_sel() Mukesh Rathor
2013-05-15 0:52 ` [PATCH 13/20] PVH xen: introduce vmx_pvh.c Mukesh Rathor
2013-05-15 11:46 ` Jan Beulich
2013-05-15 0:52 ` [PATCH 14/20] PVH xen: some misc changes like mtrr, intr, msi Mukesh Rathor
2013-05-15 0:52 ` [PATCH 15/20] PVH xen: hcall page initialize, create PVH guest type, etc Mukesh Rathor
2013-05-15 0:52 ` [PATCH 16/20] PVH xen: Miscellaneous changes Mukesh Rathor
2013-05-15 11:53 ` Jan Beulich
2013-05-16 1:51 ` Mukesh Rathor
2013-05-15 0:52 ` [PATCH 17/20] PVH xen: Introduce p2m_map_foreign Mukesh Rathor
2013-05-15 11:55 ` Jan Beulich
2013-05-15 0:52 ` [PATCH 18/20] PVH xen: Add and remove foreign pages Mukesh Rathor
2013-05-15 12:05 ` Jan Beulich
2013-05-15 0:52 ` [PATCH 19/20] PVH xen: elf and iommu related changes to prep for dom0 PVH Mukesh Rathor
2013-05-15 12:12 ` Jan Beulich
2013-05-16 1:58 ` Mukesh Rathor
2013-05-16 8:03 ` Jan Beulich
2013-05-17 1:14 ` Mukesh Rathor
2013-05-17 6:45 ` Jan Beulich
2013-05-18 2:01 ` Mukesh Rathor
2013-05-21 7:14 ` Jan Beulich
2013-05-15 0:52 ` [PATCH 20/20] PVH xen: PVH dom0 creation Mukesh Rathor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130515160500.337cd014@mantra.us.oracle.com \
--to=mukesh.rathor@oracle.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).