From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Subject: Re: [Xen-users] xen forum Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 12:31:02 -0400 Message-ID: <20130521163102.GB3669@phenom.dumpdata.com> References: <20130521142917.GO492@phenom.dumpdata.com> <1369148649.60268.YahooMailNeo@web171304.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1369148649.60268.YahooMailNeo@web171304.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Murray Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 04:04:09PM +0100, Ian Murray wrote: > > > >It would be easier for us if the bug reports and such were posted on xen-devel. > >Please consult http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs.html when > >doing it. > > > > > My own experience is that posts (at least from me) are regularly missed/ignored on the devel list, including a signed patch, so I personally think a bug tracker would be a better option. Bug trackers don't (or at least shouldn't :) ) forget or miss. That's they're raison d'etre. I honestly don't know how anyone can do business using this list, but that's just my humble opinion. Did you also look in the MAINTAINERS file to make sure you copied the right maintainer? The reason for skipping the Bugzilla system is that it is soo out of date that we don't use it anymore. > > As professional developer and application support bod myself, I wouldn't ask anybody to read that missive; I wouldn't get any bug reports ever! > > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@lists.xen.org > http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel >