xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@canonical.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
	"Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@suse.com>,
	"Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] xen-blk(front|back): Handle large physical sector disks
Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 08:47:56 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130528124756.GA3754@phenom.dumpdata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5193A38B.4080508@canonical.com>

On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 05:02:35PM +0200, Stefan Bader wrote:
> Changed the xenbus_gather but kept the xenbus_dev_error (without being fatal) as
> that seems closer to the style of the other calls.

Hm, could you rebase this on top of stable/for-jens-3.10 please?

I get this:

patching file drivers/block/xen-blkback/xenbus.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 704.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file drivers/block/xen-blkback/xenbus.c.rej
patching file drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 542.
patch: **** malformed patch at line 133: 16


> 
> -Stefan
> 
> From cddea87d842cc5feb427f3eedefc0566d69fb9b6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@canonical.com>
> Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 16:28:15 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] xen/blk: Use physical sector size for setup
> 
> Currently xen-blkback passes the logical sector size over xenbus and
> xen-blkfront sets up the paravirt disk with that logical block size.
> But newer drives usually have the logical sector size set to 512 for
> compatibility reasons and would show the actual sector size only in
> physical sector size.
> This results in the device being partitioned and accessed in dom0 with
> the correct sector size, but the guest thinks 512 bytes is the correct
> block size. And that results in poor performance.
> 
> To fix this, blkback gets modified to pass also physical-sector-size
> over xenbus and blkfront to use both values to set up the paravirt
> disk. I did not just change the passed in sector-size because I am
> not sure having a bigger logical sector size than the physical one
> is valid (and that would happen if a newer dom0 kernel hits an older
> domU kernel). Also this way a domU set up before should still be
> accessible (just some tools might detect the unaligned setup).
> 
> [v2: Make xenbus write failure non-fatal]
> [v3: Use xenbus_scanf instead of xenbus_gather]
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@canonical.com>
> ---
>  drivers/block/xen-blkback/xenbus.c |    5 +++++
>  drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c       |   23 +++++++++++++++++++----
>  2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/block/xen-blkback/xenbus.c b/drivers/block/xen-blkback/xenbus.c
> index 8bfd1bc..25463e3 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/xen-blkback/xenbus.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/xen-blkback/xenbus.c
> @@ -704,6 +704,11 @@ again:
>  				 dev->nodename);
>  		goto abort;
>  	}
> +	err = xenbus_printf(xbt, dev->nodename, "physical-sector-size", "%u",
> +			    bdev_physical_block_size(be->blkif->vbd.bdev));
> +	if (err)
> +		xenbus_dev_error(dev, err, "writing %s/physical-sector-size",
> +				 dev->nodename);
> 
>  	err = xenbus_transaction_end(xbt, 0);
>  	if (err == -EAGAIN)
> diff --git a/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c b/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c
> index d89ef86..33b5618 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c
> @@ -542,7 +542,8 @@ wait:
>  		flush_requests(info);
>  }
> 
> -static int xlvbd_init_blk_queue(struct gendisk *gd, u16 sector_size)
> +static int xlvbd_init_blk_queue(struct gendisk *gd, u16 sector_size,
> +				unsigned int physical_sector_size)
>  {
>  	struct request_queue *rq;
>  	struct blkfront_info *info = gd->private_data;
> @@ -564,6 +565,7 @@ static int xlvbd_init_blk_queue(struct gendisk *gd, u16
> sector_size)
> 
>  	/* Hard sector size and max sectors impersonate the equiv. hardware. */
>  	blk_queue_logical_block_size(rq, sector_size);
> +	blk_queue_physical_block_size(rq, physical_sector_size);
>  	blk_queue_max_hw_sectors(rq, 512);
> 
>  	/* Each segment in a request is up to an aligned page in size. */
> @@ -667,7 +669,8 @@ static char *encode_disk_name(char *ptr, unsigned int n)
> 
>  static int xlvbd_alloc_gendisk(blkif_sector_t capacity,
>  			       struct blkfront_info *info,
> -			       u16 vdisk_info, u16 sector_size)
> +			       u16 vdisk_info, u16 sector_size,
> +			       unsigned int physical_sector_size)
>  {
>  	struct gendisk *gd;
>  	int nr_minors = 1;
> @@ -734,7 +737,7 @@ static int xlvbd_alloc_gendisk(blkif_sector_t capacity,
>  	gd->driverfs_dev = &(info->xbdev->dev);
>  	set_capacity(gd, capacity);
> 
> -	if (xlvbd_init_blk_queue(gd, sector_size)) {
> +	if (xlvbd_init_blk_queue(gd, sector_size, physical_sector_size)) {
>  		del_gendisk(gd);
>  		goto release;
>  	}
> @@ -1395,6 +1398,7 @@ static void blkfront_connect(struct blkfront_info *info)
>  {
>  	unsigned long long sectors;
>  	unsigned long sector_size;
> +	unsigned int physical_sector_size;
>  	unsigned int binfo;
>  	int err;
>  	int barrier, flush, discard, persistent;
> @@ -1437,6 +1441,16 @@ static void blkfront_connect(struct blkfront_info *info)
>  		return;
>  	}
> 
> +	/*
> +	 * physcial-sector-size is a newer field, so old backends may not
> +	 * provide this. Assume physical sector size to be the same as
> +	 * sector_size in that case.
> +	 */
> +	err = xenbus_scanf(XBT_NIL, info->xbdev->otherend,
> +			   "physical-sector-size", "%u", &physical_sector_size);
> +	if (err != 1)
> +		physical_sector_size = sector_size;
> +
>  	info->feature_flush = 0;
>  	info->flush_op = 0;
> 
> @@ -1483,7 +1497,8 @@ static void blkfront_connect(struct blkfront_info *info)
>  	else
>  		info->feature_persistent = persistent;
> 
> -	err = xlvbd_alloc_gendisk(sectors, info, binfo, sector_size);
> +	err = xlvbd_alloc_gendisk(sectors, info, binfo, sector_size,
> +				  physical_sector_size);
>  	if (err) {
>  		xenbus_dev_fatal(info->xbdev, err, "xlvbd_add at %s",
>  				 info->xbdev->otherend);
> -- 
> 1.7.9.5
> 

> From cddea87d842cc5feb427f3eedefc0566d69fb9b6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@canonical.com>
> Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 16:28:15 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] xen/blk: Use physical sector size for setup
> 
> Currently xen-blkback passes the logical sector size over xenbus and
> xen-blkfront sets up the paravirt disk with that logical block size.
> But newer drives usually have the logical sector size set to 512 for
> compatibility reasons and would show the actual sector size only in
> physical sector size.
> This results in the device being partitioned and accessed in dom0 with
> the correct sector size, but the guest thinks 512 bytes is the correct
> block size. And that results in poor performance.
> 
> To fix this, blkback gets modified to pass also physical-sector-size
> over xenbus and blkfront to use both values to set up the paravirt
> disk. I did not just change the passed in sector-size because I am
> not sure having a bigger logical sector size than the physical one
> is valid (and that would happen if a newer dom0 kernel hits an older
> domU kernel). Also this way a domU set up before should still be
> accessible (just some tools might detect the unaligned setup).
> 
> [v2: Make xenbus write failure non-fatal]
> [v3: Use xenbus_scanf instead of xenbus_gather]
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@canonical.com>
> ---
>  drivers/block/xen-blkback/xenbus.c |    5 +++++
>  drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c       |   23 +++++++++++++++++++----
>  2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/block/xen-blkback/xenbus.c b/drivers/block/xen-blkback/xenbus.c
> index 8bfd1bc..25463e3 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/xen-blkback/xenbus.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/xen-blkback/xenbus.c
> @@ -704,6 +704,11 @@ again:
>  				 dev->nodename);
>  		goto abort;
>  	}
> +	err = xenbus_printf(xbt, dev->nodename, "physical-sector-size", "%u",
> +			    bdev_physical_block_size(be->blkif->vbd.bdev));
> +	if (err)
> +		xenbus_dev_error(dev, err, "writing %s/physical-sector-size",
> +				 dev->nodename);
>  
>  	err = xenbus_transaction_end(xbt, 0);
>  	if (err == -EAGAIN)
> diff --git a/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c b/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c
> index d89ef86..33b5618 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c
> @@ -542,7 +542,8 @@ wait:
>  		flush_requests(info);
>  }
>  
> -static int xlvbd_init_blk_queue(struct gendisk *gd, u16 sector_size)
> +static int xlvbd_init_blk_queue(struct gendisk *gd, u16 sector_size,
> +				unsigned int physical_sector_size)
>  {
>  	struct request_queue *rq;
>  	struct blkfront_info *info = gd->private_data;
> @@ -564,6 +565,7 @@ static int xlvbd_init_blk_queue(struct gendisk *gd, u16 sector_size)
>  
>  	/* Hard sector size and max sectors impersonate the equiv. hardware. */
>  	blk_queue_logical_block_size(rq, sector_size);
> +	blk_queue_physical_block_size(rq, physical_sector_size);
>  	blk_queue_max_hw_sectors(rq, 512);
>  
>  	/* Each segment in a request is up to an aligned page in size. */
> @@ -667,7 +669,8 @@ static char *encode_disk_name(char *ptr, unsigned int n)
>  
>  static int xlvbd_alloc_gendisk(blkif_sector_t capacity,
>  			       struct blkfront_info *info,
> -			       u16 vdisk_info, u16 sector_size)
> +			       u16 vdisk_info, u16 sector_size,
> +			       unsigned int physical_sector_size)
>  {
>  	struct gendisk *gd;
>  	int nr_minors = 1;
> @@ -734,7 +737,7 @@ static int xlvbd_alloc_gendisk(blkif_sector_t capacity,
>  	gd->driverfs_dev = &(info->xbdev->dev);
>  	set_capacity(gd, capacity);
>  
> -	if (xlvbd_init_blk_queue(gd, sector_size)) {
> +	if (xlvbd_init_blk_queue(gd, sector_size, physical_sector_size)) {
>  		del_gendisk(gd);
>  		goto release;
>  	}
> @@ -1395,6 +1398,7 @@ static void blkfront_connect(struct blkfront_info *info)
>  {
>  	unsigned long long sectors;
>  	unsigned long sector_size;
> +	unsigned int physical_sector_size;
>  	unsigned int binfo;
>  	int err;
>  	int barrier, flush, discard, persistent;
> @@ -1437,6 +1441,16 @@ static void blkfront_connect(struct blkfront_info *info)
>  		return;
>  	}
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * physcial-sector-size is a newer field, so old backends may not
> +	 * provide this. Assume physical sector size to be the same as
> +	 * sector_size in that case.
> +	 */
> +	err = xenbus_scanf(XBT_NIL, info->xbdev->otherend,
> +			   "physical-sector-size", "%u", &physical_sector_size);
> +	if (err != 1)
> +		physical_sector_size = sector_size;
> +
>  	info->feature_flush = 0;
>  	info->flush_op = 0;
>  
> @@ -1483,7 +1497,8 @@ static void blkfront_connect(struct blkfront_info *info)
>  	else
>  		info->feature_persistent = persistent;
>  
> -	err = xlvbd_alloc_gendisk(sectors, info, binfo, sector_size);
> +	err = xlvbd_alloc_gendisk(sectors, info, binfo, sector_size,
> +				  physical_sector_size);
>  	if (err) {
>  		xenbus_dev_fatal(info->xbdev, err, "xlvbd_add at %s",
>  				 info->xbdev->otherend);
> -- 
> 1.7.9.5
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-05-28 12:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-05-13 17:47 [PATCH] xen-blk(front|back): Handle large physical sector disks Stefan Bader
2013-05-14  8:04 ` Jan Beulich
2013-05-15  9:26   ` Stefan Bader
2013-05-15  9:47     ` Jan Beulich
2013-05-15 10:04       ` James Harper
2013-05-15 10:10         ` Stefan Bader
2013-05-15 12:23         ` Jan Beulich
2013-05-15 13:54     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-05-15 10:58   ` Stefan Bader
2013-05-15 12:28     ` Jan Beulich
2013-05-14 14:49 ` Roger Pau Monné
2013-05-14 16:11   ` Stefan Bader
2013-05-15 15:02 ` [PATCH v3] " Stefan Bader
2013-05-22 11:48   ` Stefan Bader
2013-05-22 12:21     ` Jan Beulich
2013-05-22 13:15       ` Stefan Bader
2013-05-22 13:22         ` Jan Beulich
2013-05-22 13:02     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-05-28 12:47   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2013-05-28 12:55     ` Stefan Bader
2013-05-28 16:17       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-05-28 18:03         ` Stefan Bader
2013-06-05 20:25           ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130528124756.GA3754@phenom.dumpdata.com \
    --to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
    --cc=stefan.bader@canonical.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).