xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
Cc: annie.li@oracle.com, david.vrabel@citrix.com,
	ian.campbell@citrix.com, msw@amazon.com, xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2 V3] xen-netback: switch to NAPI + kthread 1:1 model
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2013 09:02:04 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130603130204.GI6893@phenom.dumpdata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1369827822-22929-1-git-send-email-wei.liu2@citrix.com>

On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 12:43:40PM +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> This series implements NAPI + kthread 1:1 model for Xen netback.
> 
> This model
>  - provides better scheduling fairness among vifs
>  - is prerequisite for implementing multiqueue for Xen network driver
> 
> The first two patches are ground work for the third patch. First one
> simplifies code in netback, second one can reduce memory footprint if we
> switch to 1:1 model.
> 
> The third patch has the real meat:
>  - make use of NAPI to mitigate interrupt 
>  - kthreads are not bound to CPUs any more, so that we can take
>    advantage of backend scheduler and trust it to do the right thing
> 
> Benchmark done on a Dell T3400 workstation with 4 cores, running 4
> DomUs. Netserver running in Dom0. DomUs do netperf to Dom0 with
> following command: /root/netperf -H Dom0 -fm -l120
> 
> IRQs are distributed to 4 cores by hand in the new model, while in the
> old model vifs are automatically distributed to 4 kthreads.
> 
> * New model
> %Cpu0  :  0.5 us, 20.3 sy,  0.0 ni, 28.9 id,  0.0 wa,  0.0 hi, 24.4 si, 25.9 st
> %Cpu1  :  0.5 us, 17.8 sy,  0.0 ni, 28.8 id,  0.0 wa,  0.0 hi, 27.7 si, 25.1 st
> %Cpu2  :  0.5 us, 18.8 sy,  0.0 ni, 30.7 id,  0.0 wa,  0.0 hi, 22.9 si, 27.1 st
> %Cpu3  :  0.0 us, 20.1 sy,  0.0 ni, 30.4 id,  0.0 wa,  0.0 hi, 22.7 si, 26.8 st
> Throughputs: 2027.89 2025.95 2018.57 2016.23 aggregated: 8088.64
> 
> * Old model
> %Cpu0  :  0.5 us, 68.8 sy,  0.0 ni, 16.1 id,  0.5 wa,  0.0 hi,  2.8 si, 11.5 st
> %Cpu1  :  0.4 us, 45.1 sy,  0.0 ni, 31.1 id,  0.4 wa,  0.0 hi,  2.1 si, 20.9 st
> %Cpu2  :  0.9 us, 44.8 sy,  0.0 ni, 30.9 id,  0.0 wa,  0.0 hi,  1.3 si, 22.2 st
> %Cpu3  :  0.8 us, 46.4 sy,  0.0 ni, 28.3 id,  1.3 wa,  0.0 hi,  2.1 si, 21.1 st
> Throughputs: 1899.14 2280.43 1963.33 1893.47 aggregated: 8036.37
> 
> We can see that the impact is mainly on CPU usage. The new model moves
> processing from kthread to NAPI (software interrupt).
> 
> Comments?

I like it!
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------
> Change since V2:
>  - Remove per-cpu scratch space.
> 
> Change since V1:
>  - No page pool in this version. Instead page tracking facility is
>    removed.
> 
> Wei Liu (2):
>   xen-netback: remove page tracking facility
>   xen-netback: switch to NAPI + kthread 1:1 model
> 
>  drivers/net/xen-netback/common.h    |  105 +++--
>  drivers/net/xen-netback/interface.c |  122 ++++--
>  drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c   |  817 +++++++++++------------------------
>  3 files changed, 390 insertions(+), 654 deletions(-)

:-)

> 
> -- 
> 1.7.10.4
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
> 

      parent reply	other threads:[~2013-06-03 13:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-05-29 11:43 [PATCH 0/2 V3] xen-netback: switch to NAPI + kthread 1:1 model Wei Liu
2013-05-29 11:43 ` [PATCH 1/2] xen-netback: remove page tracking facility Wei Liu
2013-08-02 10:56   ` Ian Campbell
2013-05-29 11:43 ` [PATCH 2/2] xen-netback: switch to NAPI + kthread 1:1 model Wei Liu
2013-08-02 12:20   ` Ian Campbell
2013-08-05  2:31     ` Wei Liu
2013-08-06  9:26       ` Ian Campbell
2013-08-06 12:34         ` Wei Liu
2013-06-03 13:02 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130603130204.GI6893@phenom.dumpdata.com \
    --to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=annie.li@oracle.com \
    --cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
    --cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
    --cc=msw@amazon.com \
    --cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).