From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mukesh Rathor Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/18][V6]: PVH xen: version 6 patches... Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2013 15:01:26 -0700 Message-ID: <20130605150126.181da33c@mantra.us.oracle.com> References: <1369445137-19755-1-git-send-email-mukesh.rathor@oracle.com> <20130605152316.GE28843@phenom.dumpdata.com> <1370446562.24512.205.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> <20130605183420.GA15383@phenom.dumpdata.com> <1370465514.6652.13.camel@hastur.hellion.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1370465514.6652.13.camel@hastur.hellion.org.uk> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Campbell Cc: george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com, ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com, Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, tim@xen.org, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Wed, 5 Jun 2013 21:51:54 +0100 Ian Campbell wrote: > On Wed, 2013-06-05 at 14:34 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 04:36:02PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > > > On Wed, 2013-06-05 at 11:23 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > > > On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 06:25:19PM -0700, Mukesh Rathor wrote: > > > > > I've version 6 of my patches for 64bit PVH guest for xen. > > > > > This is Phase I. These patches are built on top of git > > > > > c/s: 9204bc654562976c7cdebf21c6b5013f6e3057b3 > > > > > > > > > > V6: > > > > > The biggest change in V6 is dropping of dom0 PVH. It will > > > > > take some time to investigate and redo dom0 construct to use > > > > > unmodified PV code. These patches in V6 will allow PV dom0 to > > > > > create PVH domU. Please ack or indicate individual patches if > > > > > there are no issues, so I know they have been looked at. > > > > > > > > Ian, Tim, Ian, George, > > > > > > > > Are you guys waiting for Jan to review all the patches or just > > > > the hypervisor ones before looking at the rest (say the libxl > > > > ones)? > > > > > > There are libxl ones? I thought this was dom0 only at the moment? > > > > The patchset had support for both - dom0 and domU. But Mukesh > > dropped the dom0 ones and is focusing on domU only. The changes are > > to libxc and libxl: > > I thought the series (up to v5 at least) was dom0 *only*, I hadn't > realised this had been flipped onto its head for the v6 posting. There was never a dom0 only series, initially it was both, then dom0 got dropped, as Jan wants a different approach. > > [PATCH 08/18] PVH xen: tools changes to create PVH domain > > I'll try and find time to take a look, but it might have to wait until > after 4.3. This patch was looked at in the very early versions... So I hope nothing major after all this time. thanks M-