From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>, Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>,
Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>,
Myron Stowe <myron.stowe@redhat.com>,
Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>,
"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@avionic-design.de>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3, part1 04/10] PCI: mark pci_scan_bus_parented() as __deprecated
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2013 10:37:58 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130607143758.GA13427@phenom.dumpdata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51B0B99C.4020009@gmail.com>
On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 12:32:28AM +0800, Jiang Liu wrote:
> On Thu 06 Jun 2013 04:04:36 AM CST, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > [+cc Konrad, Jeremy, xen-devel (users of interface you're deprecating)]
> >
> > On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 7:48 AM, Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Mark pci_scan_bus_parented() as __deprecated and clean up outdated
> >> comments.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
> >> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com>
> >> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> >> Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@avionic-design.de>
> >> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> >> Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
> >> ---
> >> arch/tile/kernel/pci.c | 3 ---
> >> include/linux/pci.h | 4 ++--
> >> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/tile/kernel/pci.c b/arch/tile/kernel/pci.c
> >> index 67237d3..936e087 100644
> >> --- a/arch/tile/kernel/pci.c
> >> +++ b/arch/tile/kernel/pci.c
> >> @@ -309,9 +309,6 @@ int __init pcibios_init(void)
> >> *
> >> * It reads the PCI tree for this bus into the Linux
> >> * data structures.
> >> - *
> >> - * This is inlined in linux/pci.h and calls into
> >> - * pci_scan_bus_parented() in probe.c.
> >> */
> >> pci_add_resource(&resources, &ioport_resource);
> >> pci_add_resource(&resources, &iomem_resource);
> >> diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h
> >> index b0f4a82..7b23fa0 100644
> >> --- a/include/linux/pci.h
> >> +++ b/include/linux/pci.h
> >> @@ -720,8 +720,8 @@ void pcibios_bus_to_resource(struct pci_dev *dev, struct resource *res,
> >> void pcibios_scan_specific_bus(int busn);
> >> struct pci_bus *pci_find_bus(int domain, int busnr);
> >> void pci_bus_add_devices(const struct pci_bus *bus);
> >> -struct pci_bus *pci_scan_bus_parented(struct device *parent, int bus,
> >> - struct pci_ops *ops, void *sysdata);
> >> +struct pci_bus * __deprecated pci_scan_bus_parented(struct device *parent,
> >> + int bus, struct pci_ops *ops, void *sysdata);
> >> struct pci_bus *pci_scan_bus(int bus, struct pci_ops *ops, void *sysdata);
> >> struct pci_bus *pci_create_root_bus(struct device *parent, int bus,
> >> struct pci_ops *ops, void *sysdata,
> >
> > I think this patch is a good idea, but I think we need to change the
> > only existing user of pci_scan_bus_parented() (pcifront_scan_root() in
> > drivers/pci/xen-pcifront.c) at the same time, so xen doesn't start
> > getting build warnings. The deprecation warnings are really intended
> > for out-of-tree users that we aren't able to fix ourselves.
> >
> > I'm getting this series queued up in
> > http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/helgaas/pci.git/log/?h=pci/jiang-bus-lock-v3,
> > so if you want to send a patch just for xen, I can fold that in.
> >
> > Bjorn
> Hi Bjorn,
> I have posted a big patch for that, but still need help from
> Xen experts to review it.
> Please refer to https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2578551/
Hm, I seem to get:
/home/konrad/linux/drivers/pci/xen-pcifront.c: In function ‘pcifront_free_roots’:
/home/konrad/linux/drivers/pci/xen-pcifront.c:559: error: implicit declaration of function ‘for_each_pci_root_bus’
/home/konrad/linux/drivers/pci/xen-pcifront.c:559: error: expected ‘;’ before ‘{’ token
/home/konrad/linux/drivers/pci/xen-pcifront.c:554: warning: unused variable ‘sd’
with it? Is there an up-to-date patch?
I have these in my tree:
311db40 PCI, xen-pcifront: use new PCI interfaces to simplify implementation
4079fee Merge remote-tracking branch 'bjorn/pci/jiang-bus-lock-v3' into testing
ddb7c6b PCI: Hide remove and rescan sysfs interfaces for SR-IOV virtual functions
f5cfa3a PCI: Simplify IOV implementation and fix reference count races
28b4f07 PCI: Drop redundant setting of bus->is_added in virtfn_add_bus()
442655a unicore32/PCI: Remove redundant call of pci_bus_add_devices()
defd601 m68k/PCI: Remove redundant call of pci_bus_add_devices()
340e3fb PCI: Make PCI host bridge/bus creating and destroying logic symmetric
c7025f7 ia64/PCI: Clean up pci_scan_root_bus() usage
c1f41ce PCI: Mark pci_scan_bus_parented() as __deprecated
13e5057 PCI: Convert alloc_pci_dev(void) to pci_alloc_dev(bus)
007042a PCI: Introduce pci_alloc_dev(struct pci_bus*) to replace alloc_pci_dev()
fe830ef PCI: Introduce pci_bus_{get|put}() to manage PCI bus reference count
Also oddly enough your SoB does not match your Author. Here is
what git shows:
=== > Author: Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com> 2013-05-25 09:48:38
=== > Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
You can add in the gmail an new 'email alias' so that the emails will
look as they come from your huawei address.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-07 14:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1369489718-25869-1-git-send-email-jiang.liu@huawei.com>
[not found] ` <1369489718-25869-5-git-send-email-jiang.liu@huawei.com>
2013-06-05 20:04 ` [PATCH v3, part1 04/10] PCI: mark pci_scan_bus_parented() as __deprecated Bjorn Helgaas
2013-06-06 16:32 ` Jiang Liu
2013-06-07 14:37 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2013-06-07 15:11 ` Jiang Liu
2013-06-07 15:30 ` Jiang Liu
2013-06-07 20:37 ` Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130607143758.GA13427@phenom.dumpdata.com \
--to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=cmetcalf@tilera.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=jiang.liu@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liuj97@gmail.com \
--cc=myron.stowe@redhat.com \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=thierry.reding@avionic-design.de \
--cc=toshi.kani@hp.com \
--cc=wangyijing@huawei.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).