From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Subject: Re: xl pci-detach vs xm pci-detach in Xen 4.3 (one works, the other does not) Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 09:20:56 -0400 Message-ID: <20130610132056.GC4504@phenom.dumpdata.com> References: <20130607154553.GC24882@phenom.dumpdata.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: George Dunlap Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , Jan Beulich , xenbugs List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 12:12:47PM +0100, George Dunlap wrote: > create ^ > title it xl pci-detach failure > thanks > > On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk > wrote: > > any thoughts? I don't know if this is a regression or not, but the > > libxl errors are pointing me to the recent XSA issue - which I thought > > was fixed? > > I think the recent issue was with xend not working. Did we fix send > and break xl? Could be. It might also be that that 'xl' never did it the same way as 'xend' (meaning this might be a XenBus teardown change). Note also that this is PV guests - and I think most of the testing had been with the HVM guests with PCI passthrough. So it might be a seperate issue altogether. Or that nobody tried doing PCI plug/unplug in the past :-( > > In any case, this is a pretty important feature; I think we need to > sort it out before release, so I'm giving it a bug id to track. > > Is "pci permissive" set in the global xl.conf file? No. Let me of course try that. > > Have you tried this with say, a stock Debian Wheezy kernel? No. A v3.10-rc4 with Xen 4.3 latest. Is Debian Wheezy a 2.6.32 kernel? > > -George > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@lists.xen.org > http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel >