From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>,
Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>,
Myron Stowe <myron.stowe@redhat.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>,
Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2, part3 07/11] PCI, xen-pcifront: use new PCI interfaces to simplify implementation
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 12:58:01 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130610165801.GA24823@phenom.dumpdata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51B4B266.5010100@gmail.com>
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 12:50:46AM +0800, Jiang Liu wrote:
> On Sat 08 Jun 2013 01:07:06 AM CST, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 08, 2013 at 12:50:31AM +0800, Jiang Liu wrote:
> >> On 06/07/2013 11:38 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 10:50:24AM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> >>>> On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 11:50:55PM +0800, Jiang Liu wrote:
> >>>>> Use new PCI interfaces to simplify xen-pcifront implementation:
> >>>>> 1) Use pci_create_root_bus() instead of pci_scan_bus_parented()
> >>>>> because pci_scan_bus_parented() is marked as __deprecated.This
> >>>>> also gets rid of a duplicated call of pci_bus_start_devices().
> >>>>> 2) Use pci_stop_root_bus() and pci_remove_root_bus() instead of
> >>>>> open-coded private implementation.
> >>>>> 3) Use pci_set_host_bridge_release() to release data structures
> >>>>> associated with PCI root buses.
> >>>>> 4) Use pci_bus_get()/pci_bus_put() to manage PCI root bus reference
> >>>>> count.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This is also a preparation for coming PCI bus lock enhancement.
> >>>
> >>> With this patch from :
> >>>
> >>> Merge branch 'pci_lock_v3' of https://github.com/jiangliu/linux into testing
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> it blows up when detaching the device.
> >> Hi Konrad,
> >> Thanks for testing! According to the log messages, this issue should
> >> be related to pci bus reference counter management. Seems we have done
> >> an extra(unbalanced) release of pci bus device.
> >> Will investigate it tomorrow!
> >
> > That is quite commendable that you are willing to look over this on
> > the weekend but I am not going to be able to rerun this test until
> > some time in the week. You could enjoy the weekend and just look at
> > this during the week.
>
> Hi Konrad,
> We should have root-caused this bug, which is caused by
> for_each_pci_root_bus().
> Current implementation doesn't support root bus deletion when walking
> PCI root
> buses by for_each_pci_root_bus(). The reference counter
> (pci_bus->dev.knode_class.n_ref)
> becomes zero after returning from pci_remove_root_bus(), so it triggers
> kref warnings
> and double-free of klist_node object when we call
> pci_get_next_root_bus() to get the
> next PCI root bus.
> So we will first revert to list_for_each_entry_safe(bus, temp,
> &pci_root_buses, node)
> and solve this issue in next version of for_each_pci_root_bus().
That definitly solves the issue. Thanks!
I used pci_lock_v3 of https://github.com/jiangliu/linux and the fix
below.
Is there a new patchset you are going to be posting or a git branch
that I can look over?
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-10 16:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1368719459-24800-1-git-send-email-jiang.liu@huawei.com>
2013-05-16 15:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2, part3 07/11] PCI, xen-pcifront: use new PCI interfaces to simplify implementation Jiang Liu
2013-06-07 14:50 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-06-07 15:17 ` Jiang Liu
2013-06-07 15:38 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-06-07 16:50 ` Jiang Liu
2013-06-07 17:07 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-06-09 16:50 ` Jiang Liu
2013-06-10 16:58 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2013-06-10 17:08 ` Jiang Liu
2013-06-14 18:07 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-06-07 15:50 ` Jiang Liu
2013-05-16 15:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2, part3 08/11] PCI, xen-pcifront: use PCI bus lock to protect PCI device hotplug Jiang Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130610165801.GA24823@phenom.dumpdata.com \
--to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=jiang.liu@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liuj97@gmail.com \
--cc=myron.stowe@redhat.com \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=toshi.kani@hp.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=wangyijing@huawei.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).