From: William Dauchy <william@gandi.net>
To: William Dauchy <william@gandi.net>
Cc: Ahmed Amamou <ahmed@gandi.net>, Kamel Haddadou <kamel@gandi.net>,
Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>,
Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>,
xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] xen-netback: add a pseudo pps rate limit
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2013 16:38:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130702143844.GF30876@gandi.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130624152215.GA7566@gandi.net>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1236 bytes --]
On Jun24 17:22, William Dauchy wrote:
> VM traffic is already limited by a throughput limit, but there is no
> control over the maximum packet per second (PPS).
> In DDOS attack the major issue is rather PPS than throughput.
> With provider offering more bandwidth to VMs, it becames easy to
> coordinate a massive attack using VMs. Example: 100Mbits ~ 200kpps using
> 64B packets.
> This patch provides a new option to limit VMs maximum packets per second
> emission rate.
> It follows the same credits logic used for throughput shaping. For the
> moment we have considered each "txreq" as a packet.
> PPS limits is passed to VIF at connection time via xenstore.
> PPS credit uses the same usecond period used by rate shaping check.
>
> known limitations:
> - by using the same usecond period, PPS shaping depends on throughput
> shaping.
> - it is not always true that a "txreq" correspond to a paquet
> (fragmentation cases) but as this shaping is meant to avoid DDOS
> (small paquets) such an pproximation should not impact the results.
> - Some help on burst handling will be appreciated.
>
> v2:
> - fixing some typo
any chance to get it accepted? some other comments?
Regards,
--
William
[-- Attachment #1.2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-02 14:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-24 15:22 [PATCH v2] xen-netback: add a pseudo pps rate limit William Dauchy
2013-07-02 14:38 ` William Dauchy [this message]
2013-07-02 14:59 ` Ian Campbell
2013-07-09 11:59 ` Ahmed AMAMOU
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130702143844.GF30876@gandi.net \
--to=william@gandi.net \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=ahmed@gandi.net \
--cc=kamel@gandi.net \
--cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).