From: Mukesh Rathor <mukesh.rathor@oracle.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/18] PVH xen: Support privileged op emulation for PVH
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2013 18:38:15 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130702183815.621e95f8@mantra.us.oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51CD718F02000078000E17B3@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
On Fri, 28 Jun 2013 10:20:47 +0100
"Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote:
> >>> On 28.06.13 at 01:43, Mukesh Rathor <mukesh.rathor@oracle.com>
> >>> wrote:
> > On Thu, 27 Jun 2013 08:22:42 +0100
> > "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote:
> >
> >> >>> On 27.06.13 at 00:41, Mukesh Rathor <mukesh.rathor@oracle.com>
> >> >>> wrote:
> >> > On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 10:36:41 +0100
> >> > "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote:
> >> >
> values from struct cpu_user_regs in the PVH case is wrong. It was
> you continuing to point to the context switch path, making me
> believe that so far you don't properly suppress the uses of
> {save,load}_segments() for PVH.
>
> >> Furthermore - the reading from struct cpu_user_regs continues
> >> to be bogus (read: at least a latent bug) as long as you don't
> >> always save the selector registers, which you now validly don't
> >> do anymore.
> >
> > Right, because you made me move it to the path that calls the
> > macro. So, for the path that the macro is called, the selectors
> > would have been read. So, whats the latent bug?
>
> The problem is that you think that now and forever this macro
> will only be used from the MMIO emulation path (or some such, in
> any case - just from one very specific path). This is an assumption
> you may make while in an early development phase, but not in
> patches that you intend to be committed: Someone adding another
> use of the macro is _very_ unlikely to go and check what contraints
> apply to that use. The macro has to work in the general case.
Hmm.. Ok, I still fail to see the difference, caching upfront always is
such a low overhead. Anyways, I can make the change, but do realize that
the name parameter will need to change to 'enum x86_segment', and so all
callers will need to change too. The macro will now need to have a
switch statement inside for non-pvh case... I may as well change it
from macro to an inlined function. hope all that sounds ok.
mukesh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-03 1:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 80+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-25 0:01 [PATCH 00/18][V7]: PVH xen: Phase I, Version 7 patches Mukesh Rathor
2013-06-25 0:01 ` [PATCH 01/18] PVH xen: turn gdb_frames/gdt_ents into union Mukesh Rathor
2013-06-25 8:40 ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-25 0:01 ` [PATCH 02/18] PVH xen: add params to read_segment_register Mukesh Rathor
2013-06-25 0:01 ` [PATCH 03/18] PVH xen: Move e820 fields out of pv_domain struct Mukesh Rathor
2013-06-25 8:44 ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-25 0:01 ` [PATCH 04/18] PVH xen: vmx related preparatory changes for PVH Mukesh Rathor
2013-06-25 8:48 ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-25 0:01 ` [PATCH 05/18] PVH xen: hvm/vmcs " Mukesh Rathor
2013-06-25 8:51 ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-25 0:01 ` [PATCH 06/18] PVH xen: Introduce PVH guest type and some basic changes Mukesh Rathor
2013-06-25 9:01 ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-26 1:14 ` Mukesh Rathor
2013-06-26 8:18 ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-25 0:01 ` [PATCH 07/18] PVH xen: domain create, schedular related code changes Mukesh Rathor
2013-06-25 9:13 ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-25 0:01 ` [PATCH 08/18] PVH xen: support invalid op emulation for PVH Mukesh Rathor
2013-06-25 9:16 ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-25 0:01 ` [PATCH 09/18] PVH xen: Support privileged " Mukesh Rathor
2013-06-25 9:36 ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-26 22:41 ` Mukesh Rathor
2013-06-27 7:22 ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-27 23:43 ` Mukesh Rathor
2013-06-28 9:20 ` Jan Beulich
2013-07-03 1:38 ` Mukesh Rathor [this message]
2013-07-03 10:21 ` Jan Beulich
2013-07-04 2:00 ` Mukesh Rathor
2013-07-04 8:04 ` Jan Beulich
2013-07-06 1:43 ` Mukesh Rathor
2013-06-25 0:01 ` [PATCH 10/18] PVH xen: interrupt/event-channel delivery to PVH Mukesh Rathor
2013-06-25 14:29 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-07-12 0:29 ` Mukesh Rathor
2013-06-25 0:01 ` [PATCH 11/18] PVH xen: additional changes to support PVH guest creation and execution Mukesh Rathor
2013-06-25 0:01 ` [PATCH 12/18] PVH xen: mapcache and show registers Mukesh Rathor
2013-06-25 9:45 ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-25 0:01 ` [PATCH 13/18] PVH xen: mtrr, tsc, grant changes Mukesh Rathor
2013-06-25 14:30 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-06-25 0:01 ` [PATCH 14/18] PVH xen: Checks, asserts, and limitations for PVH Mukesh Rathor
2013-06-25 9:54 ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-27 2:43 ` Mukesh Rathor
2013-06-27 7:25 ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-25 0:01 ` [PATCH 15/18] PVH xen: add hypercall support " Mukesh Rathor
2013-06-25 10:12 ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-27 3:09 ` Mukesh Rathor
2013-06-27 7:29 ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-25 0:01 ` [PATCH 16/18] PVH xen: vmcs related changes Mukesh Rathor
2013-06-25 10:17 ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-25 0:01 ` [PATCH 17/18] PVH xen: HVM support of PVH guest creation/destruction Mukesh Rathor
2013-06-25 0:01 ` [PATCH 18/18] PVH xen: introduce vmx_pvh.c Mukesh Rathor
2013-06-25 10:49 ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-27 3:30 ` Mukesh Rathor
2013-06-27 7:41 ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-28 1:28 ` Mukesh Rathor
2013-06-28 9:26 ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-28 1:35 ` Mukesh Rathor
2013-06-28 9:31 ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-29 3:03 ` Mukesh Rathor
2013-07-01 8:49 ` Jan Beulich
2013-07-06 1:31 ` Mukesh Rathor
2013-07-08 8:31 ` Jan Beulich
2013-07-08 23:09 ` Mukesh Rathor
2013-07-09 0:01 ` Mukesh Rathor
2013-07-09 7:31 ` Jan Beulich
2013-07-10 0:33 ` Mukesh Rathor
2013-07-10 7:20 ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-28 2:28 ` Mukesh Rathor
2013-06-28 9:44 ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-29 3:04 ` Mukesh Rathor
2013-07-01 8:54 ` Jan Beulich
2013-07-02 2:01 ` Mukesh Rathor
2013-07-03 1:40 ` Mukesh Rathor
2013-07-03 10:25 ` Jan Beulich
2013-07-04 2:02 ` Mukesh Rathor
2013-07-04 8:07 ` Jan Beulich
2013-07-16 2:00 ` Mukesh Rathor
2013-07-16 6:50 ` Jan Beulich
2013-07-17 0:47 ` Mukesh Rathor
2013-07-17 6:36 ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-25 10:17 ` [PATCH 00/18][V7]: PVH xen: Phase I, Version 7 patches George Dunlap
2013-06-26 0:04 ` Mukesh Rathor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130702183815.621e95f8@mantra.us.oracle.com \
--to=mukesh.rathor@oracle.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).