xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
To: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: jeremy@goop.org, gregkh@suse.de, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
	drjones@redhat.com, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	andi@firstfloor.org, hpa@zytor.com,
	stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com,
	x86@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, habanero@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	riel@redhat.com, konrad.wilk@oracle.com, ouyang@cs.pitt.edu,
	avi.kivity@gmail.com, tglx@linutronix.de, chegu_vinod@hp.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, srivatsa.vaddagiri@gmail.com,
	attilio.rao@citrix.com, pbonzini@redhat.com,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org, stephan.diestelhorst@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC V10 18/18] kvm hypervisor: Add directed yield in vcpu block path
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2013 17:18:18 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130714141818.GD11772@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130624124415.27508.74230.sendpatchset@codeblue.in.ibm.com>

On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 06:14:15PM +0530, Raghavendra K T wrote:
> kvm hypervisor: Add directed yield in vcpu block path
> 
> From: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> 
> We use the improved PLE handler logic in vcpu block patch for
> scheduling rather than plain schedule, so that we can make
> intelligent decisions.
> 
What kind of improvement this provides? Doesn't it screw up our pause
exit heuristics?

> Signed-off-by: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>  arch/ia64/include/asm/kvm_host.h    |    5 +++++
>  arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h |    5 +++++
>  arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h    |    5 +++++
>  arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h     |    2 +-
>  arch/x86/kvm/x86.c                  |    8 ++++++++
>  include/linux/kvm_host.h            |    2 +-
>  virt/kvm/kvm_main.c                 |    6 ++++--
This miss some arches.

>  7 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/ia64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/ia64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 989dd3f..999ab15 100644
> --- a/arch/ia64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/ia64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -595,6 +595,11 @@ int kvm_emulate_halt(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>  int kvm_pal_emul(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *kvm_run);
>  void kvm_sal_emul(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>  
> +static inline void kvm_do_schedule(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> +	schedule();
> +}
> +
>  #define __KVM_HAVE_ARCH_VM_ALLOC 1
>  struct kvm *kvm_arch_alloc_vm(void);
>  void kvm_arch_free_vm(struct kvm *kvm);
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index af326cd..1aeecc0 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -628,4 +628,9 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
>  #define __KVM_HAVE_ARCH_WQP
>  #define __KVM_HAVE_CREATE_DEVICE
>  
> +static inline void kvm_do_schedule(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> +	schedule();
> +}
> +
>  #endif /* __POWERPC_KVM_HOST_H__ */
> diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 16bd5d1..db09a56 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -266,4 +266,9 @@ struct kvm_arch{
>  };
>  
>  extern int sie64a(struct kvm_s390_sie_block *, u64 *);
> +static inline void kvm_do_schedule(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> +	schedule();
> +}
> +
>  #endif
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 95702de..72ff791 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -1042,5 +1042,5 @@ int kvm_pmu_set_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info);
>  int kvm_pmu_read_pmc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned pmc, u64 *data);
>  void kvm_handle_pmu_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>  void kvm_deliver_pmi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> -
> +void kvm_do_schedule(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>  #endif /* _ASM_X86_KVM_HOST_H */
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index b963c86..84a4eb2 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -7281,6 +7281,14 @@ bool kvm_arch_can_inject_async_page_present(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  			kvm_x86_ops->interrupt_allowed(vcpu);
>  }
>  
> +void kvm_do_schedule(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> +	/* We try to yield to a kicked vcpu else do a schedule */
> +	if (kvm_vcpu_on_spin(vcpu) <= 0)
> +		schedule();
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_do_schedule);
> +
>  EXPORT_TRACEPOINT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_exit);
>  EXPORT_TRACEPOINT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_inj_virq);
>  EXPORT_TRACEPOINT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_page_fault);
> diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> index f0eea07..39efc18 100644
> --- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> @@ -565,7 +565,7 @@ void mark_page_dirty_in_slot(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot,
>  void kvm_vcpu_block(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>  void kvm_vcpu_kick(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>  bool kvm_vcpu_yield_to(struct kvm_vcpu *target);
> -void kvm_vcpu_on_spin(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> +bool kvm_vcpu_on_spin(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>  void kvm_resched(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>  void kvm_load_guest_fpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>  void kvm_put_guest_fpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> index 302681c..8387247 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> @@ -1685,7 +1685,7 @@ void kvm_vcpu_block(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  		if (signal_pending(current))
>  			break;
>  
> -		schedule();
> +		kvm_do_schedule(vcpu);
>  	}
>  
>  	finish_wait(&vcpu->wq, &wait);
> @@ -1786,7 +1786,7 @@ bool kvm_vcpu_eligible_for_directed_yield(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  }
>  #endif
>  
> -void kvm_vcpu_on_spin(struct kvm_vcpu *me)
> +bool kvm_vcpu_on_spin(struct kvm_vcpu *me)
>  {
>  	struct kvm *kvm = me->kvm;
>  	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
> @@ -1835,6 +1835,8 @@ void kvm_vcpu_on_spin(struct kvm_vcpu *me)
>  
>  	/* Ensure vcpu is not eligible during next spinloop */
>  	kvm_vcpu_set_dy_eligible(me, false);
> +
> +	return yielded;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_vcpu_on_spin);
>  

--
			Gleb.

  reply	other threads:[~2013-07-14 14:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-24 12:40 [PATCH RFC V10 0/18] Paravirtualized ticket spinlocks Raghavendra K T
2013-06-24 12:40 ` [PATCH RFC V10 1/18] x86/spinlock: Replace pv spinlocks with pv ticketlocks Raghavendra K T
2013-06-24 12:40 ` [PATCH RFC V10 2/18] x86/ticketlock: Don't inline _spin_unlock when using paravirt spinlocks Raghavendra K T
2013-06-24 12:41 ` [PATCH RFC V10 3/18] x86/ticketlock: Collapse a layer of functions Raghavendra K T
2013-06-24 12:41 ` [PATCH RFC V10 4/18] xen: Defer spinlock setup until boot CPU setup Raghavendra K T
2013-06-24 12:41 ` [PATCH RFC V10 5/18] xen/pvticketlock: Xen implementation for PV ticket locks Raghavendra K T
2013-06-24 12:41 ` [PATCH RFC V10 6/18] xen/pvticketlocks: Add xen_nopvspin parameter to disable xen pv ticketlocks Raghavendra K T
2013-06-24 12:42 ` [PATCH RFC V10 7/18] x86/pvticketlock: Use callee-save for lock_spinning Raghavendra K T
2013-06-24 12:42 ` [PATCH RFC V10 8/18] x86/pvticketlock: When paravirtualizing ticket locks, increment by 2 Raghavendra K T
2013-06-24 12:42 ` [PATCH RFC V10 9/18] jump_label: Split out rate limiting from jump_label.h Raghavendra K T
2013-06-24 12:42 ` [PATCH RFC V10 10/18] x86/ticketlock: Add slowpath logic Raghavendra K T
2013-06-24 12:42 ` [PATCH RFC V10 11/18] xen/pvticketlock: Allow interrupts to be enabled while blocking Raghavendra K T
2013-06-24 12:43 ` [PATCH RFC V10 12/18] kvm hypervisor : Add a hypercall to KVM hypervisor to support pv-ticketlocks Raghavendra K T
2013-07-14 13:48   ` Gleb Natapov
2013-07-15  5:53     ` Raghavendra K T
2013-06-24 12:43 ` [PATCH RFC V10 13/18] kvm : Fold pv_unhalt flag into GET_MP_STATE ioctl to aid migration Raghavendra K T
2013-06-24 12:43 ` [PATCH RFC V10 14/18] kvm guest : Add configuration support to enable debug information for KVM Guests Raghavendra K T
2013-06-24 12:43 ` [PATCH RFC V10 15/18] kvm : Paravirtual ticketlocks support for linux guests running on KVM hypervisor Raghavendra K T
2013-07-14 13:12   ` Gleb Natapov
2013-07-15  9:50     ` Raghavendra K T
2013-07-15 10:36       ` Gleb Natapov
2013-07-16  3:37         ` Raghavendra K T
2013-07-16  6:02           ` Gleb Natapov
2013-07-16 15:48             ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-16 16:31               ` Gleb Natapov
2013-07-16 18:49               ` Raghavendra K T
2013-07-16 18:42             ` Raghavendra K T
2013-07-17  9:34               ` Gleb Natapov
2013-07-17 10:05                 ` Raghavendra K T
2013-07-17 10:38                   ` Raghavendra K T
2013-07-17 12:45                   ` Gleb Natapov
2013-07-17 12:55                     ` Raghavendra K T
2013-07-17 13:25                       ` Gleb Natapov
2013-07-17 14:13                         ` Raghavendra K T
2013-07-17 14:14                           ` Raghavendra K T
2013-07-17 14:44                           ` Gleb Natapov
2013-07-17 14:55                             ` Raghavendra K T
2013-07-17 15:11                               ` Gleb Natapov
2013-07-17 15:22                                 ` Raghavendra K T
2013-07-17 15:20                               ` Raghavendra K T
2013-06-24 12:43 ` [PATCH RFC V10 16/18] kvm hypervisor : Simplify kvm_for_each_vcpu with kvm_irq_delivery_to_apic Raghavendra K T
2013-07-14 13:24   ` Gleb Natapov
2013-07-15 15:36     ` Raghavendra K T
2013-07-15 15:46       ` Gleb Natapov
2013-07-16 18:19         ` Raghavendra K T
2013-06-24 12:44 ` [PATCH RFC V10 17/18] Documentation/kvm : Add documentation on Hypercalls and features used for PV spinlock Raghavendra K T
2013-06-24 12:44 ` [PATCH RFC V10 18/18] kvm hypervisor: Add directed yield in vcpu block path Raghavendra K T
2013-07-14 14:18   ` Gleb Natapov [this message]
2013-07-15  6:04     ` Raghavendra K T
2013-06-24 13:17 ` [PATCH RFC V10 0/18] Paravirtualized ticket spinlocks Andrew Jones
2013-06-24 13:49   ` Raghavendra K T
2013-06-26  8:33   ` Raghavendra K T
2013-06-27 11:47     ` Raghavendra K T

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130714141818.GD11772@redhat.com \
    --to=gleb@redhat.com \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=attilio.rao@citrix.com \
    --cc=avi.kivity@gmail.com \
    --cc=chegu_vinod@hp.com \
    --cc=drjones@redhat.com \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=habanero@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=ouyang@cs.pitt.edu \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=srivatsa.vaddagiri@gmail.com \
    --cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=stephan.diestelhorst@amd.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).