From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tim Deegan Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen: arm: enable aborts on all physical processors. Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 18:01:43 +0100 Message-ID: <20130718170143.GC94768@ocelot.phlegethon.org> References: <1366901150-26676-1-git-send-email-ian.campbell@citrix.com> <1374149605.26728.74.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1374149605.26728.74.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Campbell Cc: Stefano Stabellini , "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org At 13:13 +0100 on 18 Jul (1374153205), Ian Campbell wrote: > (Very Belated) Ping? > > On Thu, 2013-04-25 at 15:45 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > > I'm not sure how this ended up in construct dom0 where it only affects the > > boot cpu and doesn't logically fit. > > > > Enable aborts at the same time as we enable interrupts. > > > > I'm not sure what the behaviour of an "abort worthy" operation while aborts > > are disable is, but it must surely be worse than calling do_unexpected_trap, > > which is what happens from now on. > > > > Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell Acked-by: Tim Deegan