xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] xen/evtchn: avoid a deadlock when unbinding an event channel
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 10:07:27 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130729140727.GA5848@phenom.dumpdata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1374245520-19270-2-git-send-email-david.vrabel@citrix.com>

On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 03:51:58PM +0100, David Vrabel wrote:
> From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
> 
> Unbinding an event channel (either with the ioctl or when the evtchn
> device is closed) may deadlock because disable_irq() is called with
> port_user_lock held which is also locked by the interrupt handler.

So what you are saying is that if the ioctl IOCTL_EVTCHN_UNBIND
is called (and takes an spinlock) and the evtchn_interrupt triggers
it would deadlock?

But isn't this the IRQ variant of spinlock? Which disables interrupts?
Could you perhaps write this out a bit with CPU1 and CPU2 in seperate
columns? I think I must missing something.

Thanks!
> 
> Using get_port_user() to check if a port's user is safe without the
> spin lock (as it's protected by u->bind_mutex in the ioctl) so just
> remove the unnesssary locking.

What about in the interrupt handler? It does not use the mutex?
How will it protect the get_port_user() from being stale?

  reply	other threads:[~2013-07-29 14:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-19 14:51 [PATCH 0/3] xen: evtchn and gntdev device fixes and perf improvements David Vrabel
2013-07-19 14:51 ` [PATCH 1/3] xen/evtchn: avoid a deadlock when unbinding an event channel David Vrabel
2013-07-29 14:07   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2013-07-29 15:35     ` David Vrabel
2013-07-19 14:51 ` [PATCH 2/3] xen/p2m: avoid unneccesary TLB flush in m2p_remove_override() David Vrabel
2013-07-21 14:12   ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-07-19 14:52 ` [PATCH 3/3] xen/evtchn: improve scalability by using per-user locks David Vrabel
2013-07-19 14:57 ` [PATCH 0/3] xen: evtchn and gntdev device fixes and perf improvements David Vrabel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130729140727.GA5848@phenom.dumpdata.com \
    --to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).