From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mukesh Rathor Subject: Re: PVH domU patches.... Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 11:53:46 -0700 Message-ID: <20130801115346.33705ae4@mantra.us.oracle.com> References: <51FA2328.2090806@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <51FA2328.2090806@citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Andrew Cooper Cc: "Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , Keir Fraser , Tim Deegan List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Thu, 1 Aug 2013 09:58:16 +0100 Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 01/08/13 06:50, Keir Fraser wrote: > > On 31/07/2013 22:43, "Mukesh Rathor" > > wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> I noticed the PVH domU patches are still not merged. Just wanna > >> make sure nothing from me is waited upon. Please let me know. The > >> latest tree with Tim's acks are at: > >> > >> git clone git://oss.oracle.com/git/mrathor/xen.git . > >> git checkout pvh.v10.acked-1 > >> > >> > >> Look forward to seeing them in the unstable tree soon :). > > Jan has done the bulk of the review on these and deserves a final > > say. He is on holiday until next week. > > > > -- Keir > > As for the tests I was running, I am happy to declare that there are > no apparent regressions in PV / HVM operations as a result of the > series. > > Therefore, a tentative > > PV-HVM-Regression-Tested-by: Andrew Cooper Thanks Andrew for running regressions, appreciate your help. Glad to hear no regressions, I was extra careful to make sure I don't affect normal PV/HVM paths :). thanks, Mukesh