From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gleb Natapov Subject: Re: [PATCH V12 0/14] Paravirtualized ticket spinlocks Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2013 04:02:51 +0300 Message-ID: <20130808010251.GJ15901@redhat.com> References: <20130806114020.20643.57235.sendpatchset@codeblue.in.ibm.com> <52016412.1020608@zytor.com> <5201B6FB.5080807@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <5201D180.9080005@zytor.com> <5201ED01.7000803@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20130808005012.GI2810@phenom.dumpdata.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130808005012.GI2810@phenom.dumpdata.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Cc: jeremy@goop.org, x86@kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, drjones@redhat.com, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, andi@firstfloor.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Raghavendra K T , mingo@redhat.com, habanero@linux.vnet.ibm.com, riel@redhat.com, stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com, ouyang@cs.pitt.edu, avi.kivity@gmail.com, tglx@linutronix.de, chegu_vinod@hp.com, gregkh@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, srivatsa.vaddagiri@gmail.com, attilio.rao@citrix.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 08:50:12PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 12:15:21PM +0530, Raghavendra K T wrote: > > On 08/07/2013 10:18 AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > > >>Please let me know, if I should rebase again. > > >> > > > > > >tip:master is not a stable branch; it is more like linux-next. We need > > >to figure out which topic branches are dependencies for this set. > > > > Okay. I 'll start looking at the branches that would get affected. > > (Xen, kvm are obvious ones). > > Please do let me know the branches I might have to check for. > > >From the Xen standpoint anything past v3.11-rc4 would work. > For KVM as early as past v3.11-rc1 would be OK. -- Gleb.