From: Mukesh Rathor <mukesh.rathor@oracle.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
Keir Fraser <keir.xen@gmail.com>, Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>
Subject: Re: RFC: PVH set vcpu info context in vmcs....
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 19:12:03 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130813191203.0e2e0d5f@mantra.us.oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <520A2D0402000078000EB7E7@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
On Tue, 13 Aug 2013 11:56:36 +0100
"Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote:
> >>> On 13.08.13 at 03:45, Mukesh Rathor <mukesh.rathor@oracle.com>
> >>> wrote:
> > int vmx_pvh_set_vcpu_info(struct vcpu *v, struct vcpu_guest_context
> > *ctxtp) {
> > int rc;
> >
> > if ( v->vcpu_id == 0 )
> > return 0;
>
> Bogus/pointless.
No, we don't have anything for the boot vcpu. It's totally coming up
on the flat address space. For non boot, the vcpu is coming up on the
kernel GDT. Recall it's a PV guest (coming up in an HVM container).
> > if ( !(ctxtp->flags & VGCF_in_kernel) )
> > return -EINVAL;
> >
> > if ( ctxtp->ldt_base || ctxtp->ldt_ents ||
> > (ctxtp->user_regs.cs & 4) || ctxtp->user_regs.ss ||
> > ctxtp->user_regs.es || ctxtp->user_regs.ds )
> > return -EINVAL;
>
> How about FS/GS? If you don't enforce these selectors to be zero
> too, then loading only base and selector values below isn't
> sufficient (and again potentially inconsistent).
>
> >
> > if ( ctxtp->user_regs.cs == 0 )
> > return -EINVAL;
>
> Perhaps also check RPL == 0?
OK. I still think we should just remove the check for VGCF_in_kernel,
why do we care for PVH? For 64bit PV, we needed that, but a PVH guest
can come up any RPL it chooses to, right?
Below is updated version.
thanks
Mukesh
/*
* Set vmcs fields in support of vcpu_op -> VCPUOP_initialise hcall used
* to initialise a secondary vcpu prior to boot. Called from
* arch_set_info_guest() which sets the (PVH relevant) non-vmcs fields.
*
* In case of linux:
* The call comes from cpu_initialize_context(). (boot vcpu 0 context is
* set by the tools via do_domctl -> vcpu_initialise).
*
* PVH 32bitfixme: this function needs to be modified for 32bit guest.
*/
int vmx_pvh_set_vcpu_info(struct vcpu *v, struct vcpu_guest_context *ctxtp)
{
int rc = 0;
if ( v->vcpu_id == 0 )
return 0;
if ( !(ctxtp->flags & VGCF_in_kernel) )
return -EINVAL;
if ( ctxtp->ldt_base || ctxtp->ldt_ents ||
(ctxtp->user_regs.cs & 4) || ctxtp->user_regs.ss ||
ctxtp->user_regs.es || ctxtp->user_regs.ds ||
ctxtp->user_regs.fs || ctxtp->user_regs.gs )
return -EINVAL;
if ( ctxtp->user_regs.cs == 0 || (ctxtp->user_regs.cs & 3) == 3 )
return -EINVAL;
vmx_vmcs_enter(v);
__vmwrite(GUEST_GDTR_BASE, ctxtp->gdt.pvh.addr);
__vmwrite(GUEST_GDTR_LIMIT, ctxtp->gdt.pvh.limit);
__vmwrite(GUEST_FS_BASE, ctxtp->fs_base);
__vmwrite(GUEST_GS_BASE, ctxtp->gs_base_kernel);
/* IA-32e: ss/es/ds are ignored, we load cs only. */
__vmwrite(GUEST_CS_SELECTOR, ctxtp->user_regs.cs);
if ( (rc = hvm_load_segment_selector(v, x86_seg_cs, ctxtp->user_regs.cs)) )
goto out;
if ( (rc = vmx_add_guest_msr(MSR_SHADOW_GS_BASE)) )
goto out;
vmx_write_guest_msr(MSR_SHADOW_GS_BASE, ctxtp->gs_base_user);
out:
vmx_vmcs_exit(v);
return 0;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-14 2:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-13 1:45 RFC: PVH set vcpu info context in vmcs Mukesh Rathor
2013-08-13 9:16 ` Tim Deegan
2013-08-13 12:10 ` Jan Beulich
2013-08-13 10:56 ` Jan Beulich
2013-08-14 2:12 ` Mukesh Rathor [this message]
2013-08-14 9:12 ` Jan Beulich
2013-08-14 9:57 ` George Dunlap
2013-08-15 0:25 ` Mukesh Rathor
2013-08-15 1:58 ` Mukesh Rathor
2013-08-15 6:34 ` Jan Beulich
2013-08-15 6:31 ` Jan Beulich
2013-08-16 2:26 ` Mukesh Rathor
2013-08-16 7:28 ` Jan Beulich
2013-08-16 22:28 ` Mukesh Rathor
2013-08-17 1:37 ` Mukesh Rathor
2013-08-17 10:22 ` Tim Deegan
2013-08-19 21:45 ` Mukesh Rathor
2013-08-19 9:34 ` Jan Beulich
2013-08-19 21:46 ` Mukesh Rathor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130813191203.0e2e0d5f@mantra.us.oracle.com \
--to=mukesh.rathor@oracle.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=keir.xen@gmail.com \
--cc=tim@xen.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).