From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>
Subject: Re: [Query] Xen nomenclature mapping to ARMv7
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2013 14:04:19 +0100
Message-ID: <20131004130419.GA68338@ocelot.phlegethon.org>
References: <CAPUj1ONDLhjK3V0Jh-+h84ELYuK9FOD-y57Vtpdu3yaSz1Pjyg@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAPUj1ONDLhjK3V0Jh-+h84ELYuK9FOD-y57Vtpdu3yaSz1Pjyg@mail.gmail.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Mj Embd <mj.embd@gmail.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xen.org
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

At 18:16 +0530 on 04 Oct (1380910571), Mj Embd wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I was debugging a problem and got confused into gmfn, gpfn, mfn.
> 
> There are 4 addresses when running a VM on arm
> (a) Guest Virtual
> (b) Guest Physical
> (c) IPA
> (d) Real Physical.
> 
> MFN is AFAIK is (d). Not able to map gmfn and gpn to (a)(b)(c).

On ARM, MFN is (d); GFN is (c) (== (b) too, I think).   

GMFN and GPFN are older terms that aren't consistently used, and we
really ought to get rid of them.  Please don't use them in new code.
On ARM they'll also mean (c).

Tim.