From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Subject: Re: Xen 4.4 development update: Feature freeze has started Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 09:17:21 -0500 Message-ID: <20131112141721.GA9306@phenom.dumpdata.com> References: <20131111180343.GB6475@phenom.dumpdata.com> <5281FAF902000078001023B3@nat28.tlf.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Stefano Stabellini , Sucheta Chakraborty Cc: George Dunlap , zhenzhong.duan@oracle.com, Jan Beulich , "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 12:04:29PM +0000, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > On Tue, 12 Nov 2013, Jan Beulich wrote: > > >>> On 11.11.13 at 19:03, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > >> == Open == > > >> > > >> * qemu-upstream not freeing pirq > > >> > http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/xen/devel/281498 > > >> status: patches posted, tested-and-acked > > > > > > .. but not yet committed. Ian Jackson is the person to do it right? This is the one I was thinking off: http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2013-07/msg00004.html which .. > > > > No, qemu-upstream is Stefano's playgound. > > Although the patch has been reworked for upstream QEMU > (http://marc.info/?l=xen-devel&m=137265766424502), it was only build > tested. Considering that I don't have the hardware to test it right now > and that it's not obviously correct, I was waiting for Zhenzhong to come > back and let me know if it is actually behaving as expected. .. I presume is blocked until Stefano has an Tested-by from either Sucheta (Qlogic) or Duan. CC-ing them both.