From: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>
To: xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Cc: Marcus Granado <Marcus.Granado@eu.citrix.com>,
Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>,
Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>,
Li Yechen <lccycc123@gmail.com>,
George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>,
Andrew Cooper <Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com>,
Juergen Gross <juergen.gross@ts.fujitsu.com>,
Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>,
Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>,
Justin Weaver <jtweaver@hawaii.edu>, Matt Wilson <msw@amazon.com>,
Elena Ufimtseva <ufimtseva@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 11/16] libxc: get and set soft and hard affinity
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 20:12:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131113191242.18086.73258.stgit@Solace> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131113190852.18086.5437.stgit@Solace>
by using the new flag introduced in the parameters of
DOMCTL_{get,set}_vcpuaffinity.
This happens in two new xc calls: xc_vcpu_setaffinity_hard()
and xc_vcpu_setaffinity_soft() (an in the corresponding
getters, of course).
The existing xc_vcpu_{set,get}affinity() call is also retained,
with the following behavior:
* xc_vcpu_setaffinity() sets both the hard and soft affinity;
* xc_vcpu_getaffinity() gets the hard affinity.
This is mainly for backward compatibility reasons, i.e., trying
not to break existing callers/users.
Signed-off-by: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>
---
tools/libxc/xc_domain.c | 153 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
tools/libxc/xenctrl.h | 53 ++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 190 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/libxc/xc_domain.c b/tools/libxc/xc_domain.c
index f9ae4bf..30bfe7b 100644
--- a/tools/libxc/xc_domain.c
+++ b/tools/libxc/xc_domain.c
@@ -189,13 +189,16 @@ int xc_domain_node_getaffinity(xc_interface *xch,
return ret;
}
-int xc_vcpu_setaffinity(xc_interface *xch,
- uint32_t domid,
- int vcpu,
- xc_cpumap_t cpumap)
+static int _vcpu_setaffinity(xc_interface *xch,
+ uint32_t domid,
+ int vcpu,
+ xc_cpumap_t cpumap,
+ uint32_t flags,
+ xc_cpumap_t ecpumap)
{
DECLARE_DOMCTL;
- DECLARE_HYPERCALL_BUFFER(uint8_t, local);
+ DECLARE_HYPERCALL_BUFFER(uint8_t, cpumap_local);
+ DECLARE_HYPERCALL_BUFFER(uint8_t, ecpumap_local);
int ret = -1;
int cpusize;
@@ -206,39 +209,119 @@ int xc_vcpu_setaffinity(xc_interface *xch,
goto out;
}
- local = xc_hypercall_buffer_alloc(xch, local, cpusize);
- if ( local == NULL )
+ cpumap_local = xc_hypercall_buffer_alloc(xch, cpumap_local, cpusize);
+ if ( cpumap_local == NULL )
+ {
+ PERROR("Could not allocate cpumap_local for DOMCTL_setvcpuaffinity");
+ goto out;
+ }
+ ecpumap_local = xc_hypercall_buffer_alloc(xch, ecpumap_local, cpusize);
+ if ( cpumap_local == NULL )
{
- PERROR("Could not allocate memory for setvcpuaffinity domctl hypercall");
+ xc_hypercall_buffer_free(xch, cpumap_local);
+ PERROR("Could not allocate ecpumap_local for DOMCTL_setvcpuaffinity");
goto out;
}
domctl.cmd = XEN_DOMCTL_setvcpuaffinity;
domctl.domain = (domid_t)domid;
domctl.u.vcpuaffinity.vcpu = vcpu;
- /* Soft affinity is there, but not used anywhere for now, so... */
- domctl.u.vcpuaffinity.flags = XEN_VCPUAFFINITY_HARD;
-
- memcpy(local, cpumap, cpusize);
-
- set_xen_guest_handle(domctl.u.vcpuaffinity.cpumap.bitmap, local);
+ domctl.u.vcpuaffinity.flags = flags;
+ memcpy(cpumap_local, cpumap, cpusize);
+ set_xen_guest_handle(domctl.u.vcpuaffinity.cpumap.bitmap, cpumap_local);
domctl.u.vcpuaffinity.cpumap.nr_bits = cpusize * 8;
+ set_xen_guest_handle(domctl.u.vcpuaffinity.effective_affinity.bitmap,
+ ecpumap_local);
+ domctl.u.vcpuaffinity.effective_affinity.nr_bits = cpusize * 8;
+
ret = do_domctl(xch, &domctl);
- xc_hypercall_buffer_free(xch, local);
+ memcpy(ecpumap, ecpumap_local, cpusize);
+
+ xc_hypercall_buffer_free(xch, cpumap_local);
+ xc_hypercall_buffer_free(xch, ecpumap_local);
out:
return ret;
}
+int xc_vcpu_setaffinity_soft(xc_interface *xch,
+ uint32_t domid,
+ int vcpu,
+ xc_cpumap_t cpumap,
+ xc_cpumap_t ecpumap)
+{
+ return _vcpu_setaffinity(xch,
+ domid,
+ vcpu,
+ cpumap,
+ XEN_VCPUAFFINITY_SOFT,
+ ecpumap);
+}
-int xc_vcpu_getaffinity(xc_interface *xch,
+int xc_vcpu_setaffinity_hard(xc_interface *xch,
+ uint32_t domid,
+ int vcpu,
+ xc_cpumap_t cpumap,
+ xc_cpumap_t ecpumap)
+{
+ return _vcpu_setaffinity(xch,
+ domid,
+ vcpu,
+ cpumap,
+ XEN_VCPUAFFINITY_HARD,
+ ecpumap);
+}
+
+/* Provided for backword compattibility: sets both hard and soft affinity */
+int xc_vcpu_setaffinity(xc_interface *xch,
uint32_t domid,
int vcpu,
xc_cpumap_t cpumap)
{
+ xc_cpumap_t ecpumap;
+ int ret = -1;
+
+ ecpumap = xc_cpumap_alloc(xch);
+ if (ecpumap == NULL)
+ {
+ PERROR("Could not allocate memory for DOMCTL_setvcpuaffinity");
+ return -1;
+ }
+
+ ret = _vcpu_setaffinity(xch,
+ domid,
+ vcpu,
+ cpumap,
+ XEN_VCPUAFFINITY_SOFT,
+ ecpumap);
+
+ if ( ret )
+ {
+ PERROR("Could not set soft affinity via DOMCTL_setvcpuaffinity");
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ ret = _vcpu_setaffinity(xch,
+ domid,
+ vcpu,
+ cpumap,
+ XEN_VCPUAFFINITY_HARD,
+ ecpumap);
+ out:
+ free(ecpumap);
+ return ret;
+}
+
+
+static int _vcpu_getaffinity(xc_interface *xch,
+ uint32_t domid,
+ int vcpu,
+ xc_cpumap_t cpumap,
+ uint32_t flags)
+{
DECLARE_DOMCTL;
DECLARE_HYPERCALL_BUFFER(uint8_t, local);
int ret = -1;
@@ -261,6 +344,7 @@ int xc_vcpu_getaffinity(xc_interface *xch,
domctl.cmd = XEN_DOMCTL_getvcpuaffinity;
domctl.domain = (domid_t)domid;
domctl.u.vcpuaffinity.vcpu = vcpu;
+ domctl.u.vcpuaffinity.flags = flags;
set_xen_guest_handle(domctl.u.vcpuaffinity.cpumap.bitmap, local);
domctl.u.vcpuaffinity.cpumap.nr_bits = cpusize * 8;
@@ -274,6 +358,43 @@ out:
return ret;
}
+int xc_vcpu_getaffinity_soft(xc_interface *xch,
+ uint32_t domid,
+ int vcpu,
+ xc_cpumap_t cpumap)
+{
+ return _vcpu_getaffinity(xch,
+ domid,
+ vcpu,
+ cpumap,
+ XEN_VCPUAFFINITY_SOFT);
+}
+
+int xc_vcpu_getaffinity_hard(xc_interface *xch,
+ uint32_t domid,
+ int vcpu,
+ xc_cpumap_t cpumap)
+{
+ return _vcpu_getaffinity(xch,
+ domid,
+ vcpu,
+ cpumap,
+ XEN_VCPUAFFINITY_HARD);
+}
+
+/* Provided for backward compatibility and wired to hard affinity */
+int xc_vcpu_getaffinity(xc_interface *xch,
+ uint32_t domid,
+ int vcpu,
+ xc_cpumap_t cpumap)
+{
+ return _vcpu_getaffinity(xch,
+ domid,
+ vcpu,
+ cpumap,
+ XEN_VCPUAFFINITY_HARD);
+}
+
int xc_domain_get_guest_width(xc_interface *xch, uint32_t domid,
unsigned int *guest_width)
{
diff --git a/tools/libxc/xenctrl.h b/tools/libxc/xenctrl.h
index 4ac6b8a..ec80603 100644
--- a/tools/libxc/xenctrl.h
+++ b/tools/libxc/xenctrl.h
@@ -579,10 +579,63 @@ int xc_domain_node_getaffinity(xc_interface *xch,
uint32_t domind,
xc_nodemap_t nodemap);
+/**
+ * This functions specify the scheduling affinity for a vcpu. Soft
+ * affinity is on what pcpus a vcpu prefers to run. Hard affinity is
+ * on what pcpus a vcpu is allowed to run. When set independently (by
+ * the respective _soft and _hard calls) the effective affinity is
+ * also returned. What we call the effective affinity it the intersection
+ * of soft affinity, hard affinity and the set of the cpus of the cpupool
+ * the domain belongs to. It's basically what the Xen scheduler will
+ * actually use. Returning it to the caller allows him to check if that
+ * matches with, or at least is good enough for, his purposes.
+ *
+ * A xc_vcpu_setaffinity() call is provided, mainly for backward
+ * compatibility reasons, and what it does is setting both hard and
+ * soft affinity for the vcpu.
+ *
+ * @param xch a handle to an open hypervisor interface.
+ * @param domid the id of the domain to which the vcpu belongs
+ * @param vcpu the vcpu id wihin the domain
+ * @param cpumap the (hard, soft, both) new affinity map one wants to set
+ * @param ecpumap the effective affinity for the vcpu
+ */
+int xc_vcpu_setaffinity_soft(xc_interface *xch,
+ uint32_t domid,
+ int vcpu,
+ xc_cpumap_t cpumap,
+ xc_cpumap_t ecpumap);
+int xc_vcpu_setaffinity_hard(xc_interface *xch,
+ uint32_t domid,
+ int vcpu,
+ xc_cpumap_t cpumap,
+ xc_cpumap_t ecpumap);
int xc_vcpu_setaffinity(xc_interface *xch,
uint32_t domid,
int vcpu,
xc_cpumap_t cpumap);
+
+/**
+ * This functions retrieve the hard or soft scheduling affinity for
+ * a vcpu.
+ *
+ * A xc_vcpu_getaffinity() call is provided, mainly for backward
+ * compatibility reasons, and what it does is returning the hard
+ * affinity, exactly as xc_vcpu_getaffinity_hard().
+ *
+ * @param xch a handle to an open hypervisor interface.
+ * @param domid the id of the domain to which the vcpu belongs
+ * @param vcpu the vcpu id wihin the domain
+ * @param cpumap is where the (hard, soft) affinity is returned
+ */
+int xc_vcpu_getaffinity_soft(xc_interface *xch,
+ uint32_t domid,
+ int vcpu,
+ xc_cpumap_t cpumap);
+int xc_vcpu_getaffinity_hard(xc_interface *xch,
+ uint32_t domid,
+ int vcpu,
+ xc_cpumap_t cpumap);
int xc_vcpu_getaffinity(xc_interface *xch,
uint32_t domid,
int vcpu,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-13 19:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-13 19:10 [PATCH v2 00/16] Implement vcpu soft affinity for credit1 Dario Faggioli
2013-11-13 19:11 ` [PATCH v2 01/16] xl: match output of vcpu-list with pinning syntax Dario Faggioli
2013-11-14 10:50 ` George Dunlap
2013-11-14 11:11 ` Dario Faggioli
2013-11-14 11:14 ` George Dunlap
2013-11-14 11:13 ` Dario Faggioli
2013-11-14 12:44 ` Ian Jackson
2013-11-14 14:19 ` Ian Jackson
2013-11-13 19:11 ` [PATCH v2 02/16] xl: allow for node-wise specification of vcpu pinning Dario Faggioli
2013-11-14 11:02 ` George Dunlap
2013-11-14 14:24 ` Ian Jackson
2013-11-14 14:37 ` Dario Faggioli
2013-11-13 19:11 ` [PATCH v2 03/16] xl: implement and enable dryrun mode for `xl vcpu-pin' Dario Faggioli
2013-11-13 19:11 ` [PATCH v2 04/16] xl: test script for the cpumap parser (for vCPU pinning) Dario Faggioli
2013-11-13 19:11 ` [PATCH v2 05/16] xen: fix leaking of v->cpu_affinity_saved Dario Faggioli
2013-11-14 11:11 ` George Dunlap
2013-11-14 11:58 ` Dario Faggioli
2013-11-14 14:25 ` Ian Jackson
2013-11-13 19:11 ` [PATCH v2 06/16] xen: sched: make space for cpu_soft_affinity Dario Faggioli
2013-11-14 15:03 ` George Dunlap
2013-11-14 16:14 ` Dario Faggioli
2013-11-15 10:07 ` George Dunlap
2013-11-13 19:12 ` [PATCH v2 07/16] xen: sched: rename v->cpu_affinity into v->cpu_hard_affinity Dario Faggioli
2013-11-14 14:17 ` George Dunlap
2013-11-13 19:12 ` [PATCH v2 08/16] xen: derive NUMA node affinity from hard and soft CPU affinity Dario Faggioli
2013-11-14 15:21 ` George Dunlap
2013-11-14 16:30 ` Dario Faggioli
2013-11-15 10:52 ` George Dunlap
2013-11-15 14:17 ` Dario Faggioli
2013-11-13 19:12 ` [PATCH v2 09/16] xen: sched: DOMCTL_*vcpuaffinity works with hard and soft affinity Dario Faggioli
2013-11-14 14:42 ` George Dunlap
2013-11-14 16:21 ` Dario Faggioli
2013-11-13 19:12 ` [PATCH v2 10/16] xen: sched: use soft-affinity instead of domain's node-affinity Dario Faggioli
2013-11-14 15:30 ` George Dunlap
2013-11-15 0:39 ` Dario Faggioli
2013-11-15 11:23 ` George Dunlap
2013-11-13 19:12 ` Dario Faggioli [this message]
2013-11-14 14:58 ` [PATCH v2 11/16] libxc: get and set soft and hard affinity Ian Jackson
2013-11-14 16:18 ` Dario Faggioli
2013-11-14 15:38 ` George Dunlap
2013-11-14 16:41 ` Dario Faggioli
2013-11-13 19:12 ` [PATCH v2 12/16] libxl: get and set soft affinity Dario Faggioli
2013-11-13 19:16 ` Dario Faggioli
2013-11-14 15:11 ` Ian Jackson
2013-11-14 15:55 ` George Dunlap
2013-11-14 16:25 ` Ian Jackson
2013-11-15 5:13 ` Dario Faggioli
2013-11-15 12:02 ` George Dunlap
2013-11-15 17:29 ` Dario Faggioli
2013-11-15 3:45 ` Dario Faggioli
2013-11-13 19:12 ` [PATCH v2 13/16] xl: show soft affinity in `xl vcpu-list' Dario Faggioli
2013-11-14 15:12 ` Ian Jackson
2013-11-13 19:13 ` [PATCH v2 14/16] xl: enable setting soft affinity Dario Faggioli
2013-11-13 19:13 ` [PATCH v2 15/16] xl: enable for specifying node-affinity in the config file Dario Faggioli
2013-11-14 15:14 ` Ian Jackson
2013-11-14 16:12 ` Dario Faggioli
2013-11-13 19:13 ` [PATCH v2 16/16] libxl: automatic NUMA placement affects soft affinity Dario Faggioli
2013-11-14 15:17 ` Ian Jackson
2013-11-14 16:11 ` Dario Faggioli
2013-11-14 16:03 ` George Dunlap
2013-11-14 16:48 ` Dario Faggioli
2013-11-14 17:49 ` George Dunlap
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131113191242.18086.73258.stgit@Solace \
--to=dario.faggioli@citrix.com \
--cc=Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=Marcus.Granado@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=jtweaver@hawaii.edu \
--cc=juergen.gross@ts.fujitsu.com \
--cc=keir@xen.org \
--cc=lccycc123@gmail.com \
--cc=msw@amazon.com \
--cc=ufimtseva@gmail.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).