From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/16] tmem: cleanup: drop some debug code
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 13:46:19 -0500
Message-ID: <20131120184618.GA11261@phenom.dumpdata.com>
References: <1384937185-24749-1-git-send-email-bob.liu@oracle.com>
	<528C8A050200007800104E5A@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
	<528C7E99.8010303@oracle.com>
	<528C8E360200007800104E9E@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
	<20131120135108.GA9104@phenom.dumpdata.com>
	<528CD38D020000780010514A@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39])
	by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>) id 1VjCnE-00024w-Sf
	for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 20 Nov 2013 18:46:29 +0000
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <528CD38D020000780010514A@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Bob Liu <lliubbo@gmail.com>, keir@xen.org, ian.campbell@citrix.com
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 02:21:49PM +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 20.11.13 at 14:51, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 09:25:58AM +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >>> On 20.11.13 at 10:19, Bob Liu <bob.liu@oracle.com> wrote:
> >> > On 11/20/2013 05:08 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >> Isn't this a re-send of something you sent before, and that Konrad
> >> > 
> >> > No, this is not re-send.
> >> > This series are further cleanups based on my previous [00/11].
> >> 
> >> In which case you should have made clear that its relation to
> >> the earlier series (i.e. I assume this new one goes on top of the
> >> previous one).
> >> 
> >> > And I'm afraid I'll continue to send out many patches because there are
> >> > still many work needed to finish in order to make tmem readable and
> >> > maintainable.
> >> 
> >> Fine with me, albeit applying all those will (if I'm the one to do it)
> >> be handled with relatively low priority.
> > 
> > Jan, if you are the one that will commit them - could you please wait for:
> > a) either my Ack on them or, b) when I send a GIT PULL?
> 
> Of course - did my reply sound as if I meant to skip you?

You did not mention whether you would or would not. Hence the
extra pre-caution on my side.

Thanks!