From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mukesh Rathor Subject: Re: PVH and mtrr/PAT......... Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 16:42:23 -0800 Message-ID: <20131121164223.4f441a07@mantra.us.oracle.com> References: <20131119181139.5e794708@mantra.us.oracle.com> <528C83F00200007800104DB6@nat28.tlf.novell.com> <20131120184227.2cf85302@mantra.us.oracle.com> <528DF11102000078000A77BD@nat28.tlf.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1VjepK-0000XE-1u for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 00:42:30 +0000 In-Reply-To: <528DF11102000078000A77BD@nat28.tlf.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jan Beulich Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Thu, 21 Nov 2013 11:40:01 +0000 "Jan Beulich" wrote: > >>> Mukesh Rathor 11/21/13 3:42 AM >>> > >On Wed, 20 Nov 2013 08:42:08 +0000 "Jan Beulich" > >wrote: > >> >>> On 20.11.13 at 03:11, Mukesh Rathor > >> >>> wrote: ..... > >Or, can we just set WB for all RAM, and UC for all non-ram for > >PVH and keep it simple? > > As a first step it could be that simple, but as soon as possible at > least WC should be taken into consideration. Thanks, that helps a lot. Sending patch. Mukesh