xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>
To: xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Cc: Marcus Granado <Marcus.Granado@eu.citrix.com>,
	Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>,
	Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>,
	Li Yechen <lccycc123@gmail.com>,
	George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>,
	Andrew Cooper <Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com>,
	Juergen Gross <juergen.gross@ts.fujitsu.com>,
	Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>,
	Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>,
	Justin Weaver <jtweaver@hawaii.edu>, Matt Wilson <msw@amazon.com>,
	Elena Ufimtseva <ufimtseva@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 09/15] xen: derive NUMA node affinity from hard and soft CPU affinity
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 19:57:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131122185751.11200.86023.stgit@Solace> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131122183332.11200.20231.stgit@Solace>

if a domain's NUMA node-affinity (which is what controls
memory allocations) is provided by the user/toolstack, it
just is not touched. However, if the user does not say
anything, leaving it all to Xen, let's compute it in the
following way:

 1. cpupool's cpus & hard-affinity & soft-affinity
 2. if (1) is empty: cpupool's cpus & hard-affinity

This guarantees memory to be allocated from the narrowest
possible set of NUMA nodes, ad makes it relatively easy to
set up NUMA-aware scheduling on top of soft affinity.

Signed-off-by: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>
Reviewed-by: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
---
Changes from v3:
 * avoid pointless calls to cpumask_clear(), as requested
   during review;
 * ASSERT() non emptyness of cpupool & hard affinity, as
   suggested during review.

Changes from v2:
 * the loop computing the mask is now only executed when
   it really is useful, as suggested during review;
 * the loop, and all the cpumask handling is optimized,
   in a way similar to what was suggested during review.
---
 xen/common/domain.c |   61 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/xen/common/domain.c b/xen/common/domain.c
index d6ac4d1..4adc123 100644
--- a/xen/common/domain.c
+++ b/xen/common/domain.c
@@ -353,17 +353,17 @@ struct domain *domain_create(
 
 void domain_update_node_affinity(struct domain *d)
 {
-    cpumask_var_t cpumask;
-    cpumask_var_t online_affinity;
+    cpumask_var_t dom_cpumask, dom_cpumask_soft;
+    cpumask_t *dom_affinity;
     const cpumask_t *online;
     struct vcpu *v;
-    unsigned int node;
+    unsigned int cpu;
 
-    if ( !zalloc_cpumask_var(&cpumask) )
+    if ( !zalloc_cpumask_var(&dom_cpumask) )
         return;
-    if ( !alloc_cpumask_var(&online_affinity) )
+    if ( !zalloc_cpumask_var(&dom_cpumask_soft) )
     {
-        free_cpumask_var(cpumask);
+        free_cpumask_var(dom_cpumask);
         return;
     }
 
@@ -371,31 +371,48 @@ void domain_update_node_affinity(struct domain *d)
 
     spin_lock(&d->node_affinity_lock);
 
-    for_each_vcpu ( d, v )
-    {
-        cpumask_and(online_affinity, v->cpu_hard_affinity, online);
-        cpumask_or(cpumask, cpumask, online_affinity);
-    }
-
     /*
-     * If d->auto_node_affinity is true, the domain's node-affinity mask
-     * (d->node_affinity) is automaically computed from all the domain's
-     * vcpus' vcpu-affinity masks (the union of which we have just built
-     * above in cpumask). OTOH, if d->auto_node_affinity is false, we
-     * must leave the node-affinity of the domain alone.
+     * If d->auto_node_affinity is true, let's compute the domain's
+     * node-affinity and update d->node_affinity accordingly. if false,
+     * just leave d->auto_node_affinity alone.
      */
     if ( d->auto_node_affinity )
     {
+        /*
+         * We want the narrowest possible set of pcpus (to get the narowest
+         * possible set of nodes). What we need is the cpumask of where the
+         * domain can run (the union of the hard affinity of all its vcpus),
+         * and the full mask of where it would prefer to run (the union of
+         * the soft affinity of all its various vcpus). Let's build them.
+         */
+        for_each_vcpu ( d, v )
+        {
+            cpumask_or(dom_cpumask, dom_cpumask, v->cpu_hard_affinity);
+            cpumask_or(dom_cpumask_soft, dom_cpumask_soft,
+                       v->cpu_soft_affinity);
+        }
+        /* Filter out non-online cpus */
+        cpumask_and(dom_cpumask, dom_cpumask, online);
+        ASSERT(!cpumask_empty(dom_cpumask));
+        /* And compute the intersection between hard, online and soft */
+        cpumask_and(dom_cpumask_soft, dom_cpumask_soft, dom_cpumask);
+
+        /*
+         * If not empty, the intersection of hard, soft and online is the
+         * narrowest set we want. If empty, we fall back to hard&online.
+         */
+        dom_affinity = cpumask_empty(dom_cpumask_soft) ?
+                           dom_cpumask : dom_cpumask_soft;
+
         nodes_clear(d->node_affinity);
-        for_each_online_node ( node )
-            if ( cpumask_intersects(&node_to_cpumask(node), cpumask) )
-                node_set(node, d->node_affinity);
+        for_each_cpu( cpu, dom_affinity )
+            node_set(cpu_to_node(cpu), d->node_affinity);
     }
 
     spin_unlock(&d->node_affinity_lock);
 
-    free_cpumask_var(online_affinity);
-    free_cpumask_var(cpumask);
+    free_cpumask_var(dom_cpumask_soft);
+    free_cpumask_var(dom_cpumask);
 }

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-11-22 18:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-11-22 18:56 [PATCH v4 00/15] Implement vcpu soft affinity for credit1 Dario Faggioli
2013-11-22 18:56 ` [PATCH v4 01/15] xl: match output of vcpu-list with pinning syntax Dario Faggioli
2013-11-22 18:56 ` [PATCH v4 02/15] libxl: sanitize error handling in libxl_get_max_{cpus, nodes} Dario Faggioli
2013-11-25 17:26   ` George Dunlap
2013-11-27 13:45   ` Ian Campbell
2013-12-02 18:21     ` Dario Faggioli
2013-12-03  9:41       ` Ian Campbell
2013-12-03 11:40         ` Dario Faggioli
2013-12-03 11:45           ` Ian Campbell
2013-12-03 12:06             ` Dario Faggioli
2013-12-03 17:40               ` Ian Jackson
2013-11-22 18:56 ` [PATCH v4 03/15] libxl: introduce libxl_get_nr_cpus() Dario Faggioli
2013-11-27 13:49   ` Ian Campbell
2013-12-03 17:48   ` Ian Jackson
2013-12-03 17:52     ` Dario Faggioli
2013-12-03 17:54       ` Ian Jackson
2013-12-03 18:09         ` George Dunlap
2013-12-03 18:17           ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-12-03 18:22             ` George Dunlap
2013-12-03 18:26             ` Dario Faggioli
2013-12-03 18:19           ` Dario Faggioli
2013-12-03 18:15         ` Dario Faggioli
2013-12-03 18:16           ` Ian Jackson
2013-11-22 18:57 ` [PATCH v4 04/15] xl: allow for node-wise specification of vcpu pinning Dario Faggioli
2013-11-22 18:57 ` [PATCH v4 05/15] xl: implement and enable dryrun mode for `xl vcpu-pin' Dario Faggioli
2013-11-22 18:57 ` [PATCH v4 06/15] xl: test script for the cpumap parser (for vCPU pinning) Dario Faggioli
2013-11-22 18:57 ` [PATCH v4 07/15] xen: sched: rename v->cpu_affinity into v->cpu_hard_affinity Dario Faggioli
2013-11-22 18:57 ` [PATCH v4 08/15] xen: sched: introduce soft-affinity and use it instead d->node-affinity Dario Faggioli
2013-11-22 18:57 ` Dario Faggioli [this message]
2013-11-22 18:57 ` [PATCH v4 10/15] xen: sched: DOMCTL_*vcpuaffinity works with hard and soft affinity Dario Faggioli
2013-11-27 13:11   ` Jan Beulich
2013-11-27 14:17     ` George Dunlap
2013-11-27 14:31       ` Dario Faggioli
2013-11-22 18:58 ` [PATCH v4 11/15] libxc: get and set soft and hard affinity Dario Faggioli
2013-11-22 18:58 ` [PATCH v4 12/15] libxl: get and set soft affinity Dario Faggioli
2013-11-25 17:52   ` George Dunlap
2013-11-27 14:45   ` Ian Campbell
2013-12-02 18:17     ` Dario Faggioli
2013-12-03  9:35       ` Ian Campbell
2013-11-22 18:58 ` [PATCH v4 13/15] xl: enable getting and setting soft Dario Faggioli
2013-11-27 14:57   ` Ian Campbell
2013-12-02 18:10     ` Dario Faggioli
2013-12-03  9:32       ` Ian Campbell
2013-12-03 10:27         ` Dario Faggioli
2013-12-03 10:59           ` Ian Campbell
2013-12-03 11:14             ` Dario Faggioli
2013-12-03 11:18               ` Ian Campbell
2013-11-22 18:58 ` [PATCH v4 14/15] xl: enable for specifying node-affinity in the config file Dario Faggioli
2013-11-27 15:53   ` Ian Campbell
2013-12-02 18:22     ` Dario Faggioli
2013-11-22 18:58 ` [PATCH v4 15/15] libxl: automatic NUMA placement affects soft affinity Dario Faggioli
2013-11-27 15:55   ` Ian Campbell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20131122185751.11200.86023.stgit@Solace \
    --to=dario.faggioli@citrix.com \
    --cc=Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
    --cc=Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=Marcus.Granado@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=jtweaver@hawaii.edu \
    --cc=juergen.gross@ts.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=keir@xen.org \
    --cc=lccycc123@gmail.com \
    --cc=msw@amazon.com \
    --cc=ufimtseva@gmail.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).