From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stanislaw Gruszka Subject: Re: [BUG?] Interrupts enabled after xen_acpi_processor_resume+0x0/0x34 [xen_acpi_processor] Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 15:04:51 +0100 Message-ID: <20140131140451.GB7648@redhat.com> References: <20140128150848.GA1428@redhat.com> <20140128160404.GA5732@phenom.dumpdata.com> <20140129082521.GA1362@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140129082521.GA1362@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: David Rientjes Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, david.vrabel@citrix.com, Ben Guthro , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" , xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 09:25:21AM +0100, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote: > > Looks incomplete, what about the kzalloc() in > > xen_upload_processor_pm_data() and kcalloc()s in check_acpi_ids()? > > Indeed and additionally from check_acpi_ids() we call > acpi_walk_namespace(), which also take mutexes. Hence unfortunately > making xen_upload_processor_pm_data() atomic is not easy, but possibly > can be done by saving some data in memory after initialization. > > Or perhaps this problem can be solved differently, by not using > yscore_ops->resume(), but some other resume callback from core, which > allow to sleep. Than can require registering dummy device or sysfs > class, but maybe there are simpler solutions. Eventually work_struct could be used and scheduled from ->resume() callback, if there is no dependency between uploading processor PM data to hypervisor and other actions performed after syscore_ops->resume(); Thanks Stanislaw