From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Olaf Hering Subject: Re: [PATCH] linux-2.6.18/xencons: generalize use of add_preferred_console() Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 13:30:17 +0100 Message-ID: <20140207123017.GA31152@aepfle.de> References: <52AAE1C2020000780010CE39@nat28.tlf.novell.com> <20140206225334.GA21743@aepfle.de> <52F4A4F7020000780011A102@nat28.tlf.novell.com> <20140207083234.GA17978@aepfle.de> <52F4B1A7020000780011A14B@nat28.tlf.novell.com> <20140207100733.GA1958@aepfle.de> <52F4C280020000780011A294@nat28.tlf.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta4.messagelabs.com ([85.158.143.247]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WBkZc-0001Ma-Ms for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 12:30:24 +0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <52F4C280020000780011A294@nat28.tlf.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jan Beulich Cc: xen-devel , Ian Campbell List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Fri, Feb 07, Jan Beulich wrote: > Yes, I agree that there likely needs to be another change here. > I'm just not certain yet which way this should be done. Jan, before I start doing software archaeology: How would you want it to look like? What combinations of Xen console= and Linux xencons=/console= are useful anyway? Olaf