From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Subject: Re: How many patches are missing in upstream Linux? Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2014 14:39:15 -0500 Message-ID: <20140306193914.GA10151@localhost.localdomain> References: <53185E4D0200007800121725@nat28.tlf.novell.com> <20140306192610.GI9852@localhost.localdomain> <5318CE57.2050404@cantab.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WLe8g-0001mx-Oc for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 06 Mar 2014 19:39:30 +0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5318CE57.2050404@cantab.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: David Vrabel Cc: daniel.kiper@oracle.com, david.vrabel@citrix.com, Jan Beulich , Yang Z Zhang , "xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" , boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 07:36:55PM +0000, David Vrabel wrote: > On 06/03/2014 19:26, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > > > - TS bit issue. David Vrabel was mulling this one over. (CC-ed). > > Er. Am I? I'm not sure what this refers to. I thought so? This is http://bugs.xenproject.org/xen/bug/40 and I thought you mentioned some form of mempool for the allocation of the FPU so that we won't allocate during task switches? But you weren't too thrilled about it? > > David >