xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mukesh Rathor <mukesh.rathor@oracle.com>
To: Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>
Cc: JBeulich@suse.com, George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com,
	eddie.dong@intel.com, keir.xen@gmail.com, jun.nakajima@intel.com,
	xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Subject: Re: [V10 PATCH 3/4] pvh dom0: Add and remove foreign pages
Date: Thu, 1 May 2014 18:45:18 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140501184518.2ebccdb8@mantra.us.oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140501161908.GI86038@deinos.phlegethon.org>

On Thu, 1 May 2014 18:19:08 +0200
Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> Nearly there, except that the teardown code is now gone, with nothing
> replacing it.  Ideally we'd have some logic to find active EPT L1
> tables and undo the foreign refcounts.  If not that, then:
>  - a hard-coded check, in p2m_add_foreign I suppose, that only allows
>    foreign mappings to be added to a p2m for the hardware domain,
>    with a pvh fixme comment explaining why; and
>  - another pvh fixme comment in the p2m teardown code to say that
>    once non-hardware domains can have foreign mappings there will
>    have to be some cleanup code to handle them.

Added fixmes... 

> Also, in the inner refcounting logic:
> 
> At 18:06 -0700 on 29 Apr (1398791207), Mukesh Rathor wrote:
> > diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m-ept.c b/xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m-ept.c
> > index c0bfc50..11474e8 100644
> > --- a/xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m-ept.c
> > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m-ept.c
> > @@ -36,8 +36,6 @@
> >  
> >  #define
> > atomic_read_ept_entry(__pepte)                              \
> > ( (ept_entry_t) { .epte = read_atomic(&(__pepte)->epte) } )
> > -#define atomic_write_ept_entry(__pepte,
> > __epte)                     \
> > -    write_atomic(&(__pepte)->epte, (__epte).epte)
> >  
> >  #define is_epte_present(ept_entry)      ((ept_entry)->epte & 0x7)
> >  #define is_epte_superpage(ept_entry)    ((ept_entry)->sp)
> > @@ -46,6 +44,46 @@ static inline bool_t is_epte_valid(ept_entry_t
> > *e) return (e->epte != 0 && e->sa_p2mt != p2m_invalid);
> >  }
> >  
> > +/* returns : 0 for success, -errno otherwise */
> > +static int atomic_write_ept_entry(ept_entry_t *entryptr,
> > ept_entry_t new,
> > +                                  int level)
> > +{
> > +    bool_t same_mfn = (new.mfn == entryptr->mfn);
> > +    unsigned long oldmfn = INVALID_MFN;
> > +
> > +    if ( level )
> > +    {
> 
> ASSERT(!(new.sp && p2m_is_foreign(new.sa_p2mt))) here?

Yeah, I debated adding p2m_is_foreign ASSERT, but didn't because iirc 
Jan had said he wanted to use up the non-leaf bits for something else 
in future.  I suppose I can add it, it would be  easy
to find it anyways....  BTW, there is no path allowing 
superpage for foreign at present.

> > +        write_atomic(&entryptr->epte, new.epte);
> > +        return 0;
> > +    }
> > +
> > +    if ( unlikely(p2m_is_foreign(new.sa_p2mt)) && !same_mfn )
> > +    {
> > +        struct domain *fdom;
> > +
> > +        if ( !mfn_valid(new.mfn) )
> > +            return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +        fdom = page_get_owner(mfn_to_page(new.mfn));
> 
> This needs a matching put_pg_owner() once you're done with it.

Doing page_get_owner, not get_pg_owner here, so don't think so, right?

thanks,
Mukesh

  reply	other threads:[~2014-05-02  1:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-30  1:06 [V10 PATCH 0/4] pvh dom0 patches Mukesh Rathor
2014-04-30  1:06 ` [V10 PATCH 1/4] pvh dom0: construct_dom0 changes Mukesh Rathor
2014-05-06 15:18   ` Roger Pau Monné
2014-04-30  1:06 ` [V10 PATCH 2/4] pvh dom0: Add checks and restrictions for p2m_is_foreign Mukesh Rathor
2014-05-01 16:14   ` Tim Deegan
2014-04-30  1:06 ` [V10 PATCH 3/4] pvh dom0: Add and remove foreign pages Mukesh Rathor
2014-05-01 16:19   ` Tim Deegan
2014-05-02  1:45     ` Mukesh Rathor [this message]
2014-05-02  8:38       ` Jan Beulich
2014-05-02  8:55       ` Tim Deegan
2014-05-02 23:35         ` Mukesh Rathor
2014-05-05  7:46           ` Jan Beulich
2014-05-08 12:16           ` Tim Deegan
2014-05-08 13:25             ` Jan Beulich
2014-05-08 22:58             ` Mukesh Rathor
2014-04-30  1:06 ` [V10 PATCH 4/4] dom0: add opt_dom0pvh to setup.c Mukesh Rathor
2014-04-30 14:11 ` [V10 PATCH 0/4] pvh dom0 patches Roger Pau Monné
2014-04-30 18:12   ` Mukesh Rathor
2014-05-01  1:19     ` Mukesh Rathor
2014-05-02 11:05       ` Roger Pau Monné
2014-05-02 12:31         ` Jan Beulich
2014-05-02 14:06           ` Roger Pau Monné
2014-05-02 14:16             ` Jan Beulich
2014-05-02 14:35               ` Roger Pau Monné
2014-05-02 15:41                 ` Jan Beulich
2014-05-02 16:13                   ` Roger Pau Monné
2014-05-02 19:35                     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-05-03  0:01         ` Mukesh Rathor
2014-05-05  8:52           ` Roger Pau Monné
2014-05-06  0:28             ` Mukesh Rathor
2014-05-06  7:13               ` Roger Pau Monné
2014-05-06  8:09                 ` Jan Beulich
2014-05-07  1:00                 ` Mukesh Rathor
2014-05-07  7:50                   ` Jan Beulich
2014-05-07  9:48                     ` Roger Pau Monné
2014-05-07 11:34                       ` Jan Beulich
2014-05-08 10:27                         ` Roger Pau Monné
2014-05-08 10:44                           ` Jan Beulich
2014-05-08 15:00                             ` Roger Pau Monné
2014-05-08 15:20                               ` Jan Beulich
2014-05-07 13:25                     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-05-08  0:04                     ` Mukesh Rathor
2014-05-08  6:37                       ` Jan Beulich
2014-05-08 19:15                         ` Mukesh Rathor
2014-05-07 13:20                   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-05-07 13:38                     ` Roger Pau Monné
2014-05-08  0:12                       ` Mukesh Rathor
2014-05-08 10:52                         ` George Dunlap
2014-05-08 13:15                         ` David Vrabel
2014-05-08 22:29                           ` Mukesh Rathor
2014-05-08  0:07                     ` Mukesh Rathor
2014-05-06 19:38               ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140501184518.2ebccdb8@mantra.us.oracle.com \
    --to=mukesh.rathor@oracle.com \
    --cc=George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=eddie.dong@intel.com \
    --cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
    --cc=keir.xen@gmail.com \
    --cc=tim@xen.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).