From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: Bob Liu <lliubbo@gmail.com>
Cc: keir@xen.org, ian.campbell@citrix.com, andrew.cooper3@citrix.com,
jbeulich@suse.com, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2] xen: free_domheap_pages: delay page scrub to idle loop
Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 09:56:17 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140520135616.GD3045@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1400552132-18654-1-git-send-email-bob.liu@oracle.com>
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 10:15:31AM +0800, Bob Liu wrote:
> Because of page scrub, it's very slow to destroy a domain with large
> memory.
> It took around 10 minutes when destroy a guest of nearly 1 TB of memory.
>
> [root@ca-test111 ~]# time xm des 5
> real 10m51.582s
> user 0m0.115s
> sys 0m0.039s
> [root@ca-test111 ~]#
>
> There are two meanings to improve this situation.
> 1. Delay the page scrub in free_domheap_pages(), so that 'xl destroy xxx' can
> return earlier.
>
> 2. But the real scrub time doesn't get improved a lot, we should consider put the
> scrub job on all idle cpus in parallel. An obvious solution is add page to
> a global list during free_domheap_pages(), and then whenever a cpu enter
> idle_loop() it will try to isolate a page and scrub/free it.
> Unfortunately this solution didn't work as expected in my testing, because
> introduce a global list which also means we need a lock to protect that list.
> The cost is too heavy!
You can introduce a per-cpu list which does not need a global lock.
The problem is with insertion of items in it - that would require an IPI
which would then need to take the global lock and populate the local CPU
list.
Interestingly, this is what I had been working on to convert the
tasklets in per-cpu tasklets.
>
> So I use a percpu scrub page list in this patch, the tradeoff is we may not use
> all idle cpus. It depends on free_domheap_pages() runs on which cpu.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bob Liu <bob.liu@oracle.com>
> ---
> xen/arch/x86/domain.c | 1 +
> xen/common/page_alloc.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> xen/include/xen/mm.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/domain.c b/xen/arch/x86/domain.c
> index 6fddd4c..f3f1260 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/domain.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/domain.c
> @@ -119,6 +119,7 @@ static void idle_loop(void)
> (*pm_idle)();
I would actually do it _right_ before we call the pm_idle. As in
right before we go in C states instead of after we have been woken up -
as that means:
a) the timer expires, so a guest needs to be woken up - and we do not
want to take use its timeslice to scrub some other guest memory.
b). an interrupt that needs to be processed. (do_IRQ gets called,
does it stuff, setups the right softirq bits and then exits which
resumes).
> do_tasklet();
> do_softirq();
> + scrub_free_pages();
> }
> }
>
> diff --git a/xen/common/page_alloc.c b/xen/common/page_alloc.c
> index 601319c..b2a0fc5 100644
> --- a/xen/common/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/xen/common/page_alloc.c
> @@ -79,6 +79,8 @@ PAGE_LIST_HEAD(page_offlined_list);
> /* Broken page list, protected by heap_lock. */
> PAGE_LIST_HEAD(page_broken_list);
>
> +DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct page_list_head , page_scrub_list);
> +
> /*************************
> * BOOT-TIME ALLOCATOR
> */
> @@ -633,6 +635,9 @@ static struct page_info *alloc_heap_pages(
> goto found;
> } while ( zone-- > zone_lo ); /* careful: unsigned zone may wrap */
>
> + if ( scrub_free_pages() )
> + continue;
> +
> if ( memflags & MEMF_exact_node )
> goto not_found;
>
> @@ -1417,6 +1422,23 @@ void free_xenheap_pages(void *v, unsigned int order)
> #endif
>
>
> +unsigned long scrub_free_pages(void)
> +{
> + struct page_info *pg;
> + unsigned long nr_scrubed = 0;
> +
> + /* Scrub around 400M memory every time */
Could you mention why 400M?
> + while ( nr_scrubed < 100000 )
> + {
> + pg = page_list_remove_head( &this_cpu(page_scrub_list) );
> + if (!pg)
> + break;
> + scrub_one_page(pg);
> + free_heap_pages(pg, 0);
> + nr_scrubed++;
> + }
> + return nr_scrubed;
> +}
>
> /*************************
> * DOMAIN-HEAP SUB-ALLOCATOR
> @@ -1564,8 +1586,15 @@ void free_domheap_pages(struct page_info *pg, unsigned int order)
> * domain has died we assume responsibility for erasure.
> */
> if ( unlikely(d->is_dying) )
> + {
> + /*
> + * Add page to page_scrub_list to speed up domain destroy, those
> + * pages will be zeroed later by scrub_page_tasklet.
> + */
> for ( i = 0; i < (1 << order); i++ )
> - scrub_one_page(&pg[i]);
> + page_list_add_tail( &pg[i], &this_cpu(page_scrub_list) );
> + goto out;
> + }
>
> free_heap_pages(pg, order);
> }
> @@ -1583,6 +1612,7 @@ void free_domheap_pages(struct page_info *pg, unsigned int order)
> drop_dom_ref = 0;
> }
>
> +out:
> if ( drop_dom_ref )
> put_domain(d);
> }
> diff --git a/xen/include/xen/mm.h b/xen/include/xen/mm.h
> index b183189..3560335 100644
> --- a/xen/include/xen/mm.h
> +++ b/xen/include/xen/mm.h
> @@ -355,6 +355,7 @@ static inline unsigned int get_order_from_pages(unsigned long nr_pages)
> }
>
> void scrub_one_page(struct page_info *);
> +unsigned long scrub_free_pages(void);
>
> int xenmem_add_to_physmap_one(struct domain *d, unsigned int space,
> domid_t foreign_domid,
> --
> 1.7.10.4
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-20 13:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-20 2:15 [RFC PATCH v2] xen: free_domheap_pages: delay page scrub to idle loop Bob Liu
2014-05-20 8:20 ` Jan Beulich
2014-05-20 8:47 ` Bob Liu
2014-05-20 9:46 ` Jan Beulich
2014-05-20 13:56 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140520135616.GD3045@localhost.localdomain \
--to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=keir@xen.org \
--cc=lliubbo@gmail.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).