From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Samuel Thibault Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] mini-os: initial ARM support Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2014 16:57:19 +0200 Message-ID: <20140605145719.GC28385@type.bordeaux.inria.fr> References: <1401731397-29842-1-git-send-email-talex5@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WsZ6c-00011Y-0M for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 05 Jun 2014 14:57:26 +0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Oleksandr Tyshchenko Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Thomas Leonard , Stefano Stabellini List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Oleksandr Tyshchenko, le Thu 05 Jun 2014 17:36:05 +0300, a =E9crit : > Also, could you, please, explain me some generic things about Mini-OS: > 1. Is HAVE_LIBC a necessary config? I mean if I build Mini-OS without pro= per > LIBC support will the Mini-OS to operate fully > (are there any restrictions?) It's not necessary to see mini-os booting, drivers working, and using their interface. It is necessary to get the posix programming interface. > 2. If yes, what should I do to build Mini-OS with proper LIBC support? Most probably very little in mini-os, since the HAVE_LIBC code is very portable. I however doen't know how much newlib supports the arm target. Samuel