From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v1 1/4] rt: Add rt scheduler to
	hypervisor
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 13:05:01 -0400
Message-ID: <20140716170501.GA30483@laptop.dumpdata.com>
References: <1405054198-29106-1-git-send-email-mengxu@cis.upenn.edu>
	<1405054198-29106-2-git-send-email-mengxu@cis.upenn.edu>
	<53BFF6C4.8030200@citrix.com> <1405092111.29306.476.camel@Solace>
	<53C00554.5060501@citrix.com> <1405093697.29306.502.camel@Solace>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1405093697.29306.502.camel@Solace>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>
Cc: ian.campbell@citrix.com, xisisu@gmail.com, stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com, george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>, ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com, xen-devel@lists.xen.org, xumengpanda@gmail.com, Meng Xu <mengxu@cis.upenn.edu>, lichong659@gmail.com, dgolomb@seas.upenn.edu
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 05:48:17PM +0200, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> On ven, 2014-07-11 at 16:40 +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> > On 11/07/14 16:21, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> 
> > > So, ideas? RTDS (as per Real-Time Deferrable-Server)? RRESDS (Resource
> > > Reservation Deferrable Server)? Just DS (Deferrable Server)?
> > >
> > > I'm not sure I like much any of these...
> > >
> > > What was it that you had in mind when you said "there are several
> > > classes of realtime schedulers employing different semantics and
> > > parameters" ?
> 
> > Hmm - naming things is difficult.  How about bob?
> > 
> Well, if we go that route, I prefer Alice! :-D :-D
> 
> > My concern is that naming it "rt" seems too generic, and will cause
> > confusion of a) what type of realtime scheduler it is, and b) further
> > problems if someone wants to come and implement a different realtime
> > scheduler in the future.
> > 
> Totally understood and agreed.
> 
> > XEN_SCHEDULER_RT_DS doesn't sound too bad.
> > 
> It does not, indeed. Let's hear Meng, Sisu, and the other xen-devel
> folks...

DS9 :-)

XEN_SCHEDULER_RT_PGEDF ?

And then we can also have
 XEN_SCHEDULER_RT_CBS ?

> 
> Thanks and Regards,
> Dario
> 
> -- 
> <<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
> Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)
> 



> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel